By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Mad Nads has been on the sauce again... on 16:05 - Sep 6 by balcombeblue
That’s not what she says. Also not what succeedwithdyslexia say.
But you carry on
Depends how you bracket her speech and verbalisation issues. Chucking in the odd wrong word here and there isn't really the problem anyone's talking about. Talking complete shite is.
And if your barometer for what is believable is at all swayed by what Nadine Dorries says is true, god help you.
2
Mad Nads has been on the sauce again... on 16:50 - Sep 6 with 566 views
Mad Nads has been on the sauce again... on 16:39 - Sep 6 by FoghornGleghorn
Depends how you bracket her speech and verbalisation issues. Chucking in the odd wrong word here and there isn't really the problem anyone's talking about. Talking complete shite is.
And if your barometer for what is believable is at all swayed by what Nadine Dorries says is true, god help you.
We've not interacted on here before I don't think, thanks for adding the second paragraph but I assume you mean 'if one is swayed' and 'god help them'
I don't agree with Nadine Dorries politics or her party.
Let's try pick at the issues she is discussing, rather than being lowering ourselves.
1
Mad Nads has been on the sauce again... on 17:03 - Sep 6 with 525 views
Mad Nads has been on the sauce again... on 14:51 - Sep 6 by balcombeblue
Dorries speech and verbalisation issues are largely down to her dyslexia.
True, but the articles I've read about her dyslexia and its impact seem to suggest that it's more to do with incorrect/weird word choices ('downstream' rather than 'download' for instance) rather than how she presents in the above interview.
Her general demeanour suggests intoxication, and I was fully expecting her to rebut Guru-Murthy with something along the lines of "well I put it to you, Krishnan, that you're a stupid poo-poo head".
Not a prophet, or a stone-age man; just a mortal with potential of a superman.
Mad Nads has been on the sauce again... on 16:50 - Sep 6 by balcombeblue
We've not interacted on here before I don't think, thanks for adding the second paragraph but I assume you mean 'if one is swayed' and 'god help them'
I don't agree with Nadine Dorries politics or her party.
Let's try pick at the issues she is discussing, rather than being lowering ourselves.
I mean, do we need to? Is there anything in there you think is actually credible? Because it's a lucky dip of Trump 101 - vague attempts to discredit sources and play victim, deliberate blurring of the lines between law-breaking and rule-breaking/ethics, blaming "globally-renowned climate change activists" (so globally-renowned that they didn't recognise them for an entire year), screaming "fake news" and discrediting video evidence, and finally stropping off when the pre-prepared lines weren't landing any longer. Which bits do you think aren't to be dismissed as the witterings of a career charlatan who occasionally can't get sentences right because she's dyslexic?
1
Mad Nads has been on the sauce again... on 19:07 - Sep 6 with 259 views
Mad Nads has been on the sauce again... on 18:32 - Sep 6 by FoghornGleghorn
I mean, do we need to? Is there anything in there you think is actually credible? Because it's a lucky dip of Trump 101 - vague attempts to discredit sources and play victim, deliberate blurring of the lines between law-breaking and rule-breaking/ethics, blaming "globally-renowned climate change activists" (so globally-renowned that they didn't recognise them for an entire year), screaming "fake news" and discrediting video evidence, and finally stropping off when the pre-prepared lines weren't landing any longer. Which bits do you think aren't to be dismissed as the witterings of a career charlatan who occasionally can't get sentences right because she's dyslexic?
I think that's fair enough, it's the references to being drunk that were a bit unnecessary.
I'm not really a moral arbiter though, so apologies if it seemed that way!
0
Mad Nads has been on the sauce again... on 19:28 - Sep 6 with 216 views
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
