Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
PFA: Players Will Have to Share Financial Burden
PFA: Players Will Have to Share Financial Burden
Thursday, 2nd Apr 2020 23:30

The PFA has released a lengthy statement defending its position after reports that it is blocking player wage deferrals during the coronavirus crisis.

Premier League players are coming under pressure to take pay cuts due to football’s financial issues caused by the suspension of fixtures due to the pandemic.

Several Premier League clubs, including Tottenham, Newcastle and Norwich, have furloughed many of their staff - with League One Town planning to do the same, as revealed yesterday - which has led to increased calls for highly-earning top flight players to take a temporary wage cut to make sure non-playing staff are paid in full.

At a Downing Street press conference this afternoon, secretary of state for health and social care Matt Hancock, the MP for West Suffolk, said: “I think that everybody needs to play their part in this national effort and that means Premier League footballers too.

“Given the sacrifices that many people are making, including some of my colleagues in the NHS who have made the ultimate sacrifice of going into work and have caught the disease and have sadly died, I think the first thing that Premier League footballers can do is make a contribution, take a pay cut and play their part.”

The PFA, the players’ union, has written to its members warning them that it is "vitally important" that they are spoken to before wage cuts are accepted.

But in a lengthy statement, the PFA dismisses claims that it is blocking wage deferrals, insisting that it is instead looking for a “structured and unified approach” to the issue. Talks between the PFA, LMA, EFL and Premier League are due to continue on Friday.

The statement reads: “This is an extremely challenging and worrying time for our country, and the world, as we all try to navigate the coronavirus pandemic. Our admiration and thanks are with the NHS and all key workers who are keeping our country going at this very difficult time.

“Football, of course, faces its own challenges. As this is an ever-moving situation, our staff are working tirelessly behind the scenes on this unprecedented crisis to address the needs of the players, while considering the clubs and the wider industry.

“Our initial response to the outbreak was to focus solely on the health and safety of players, club staff and the fans.

“We circulated advice and recommendations to all players and clubs regarding best practice at the training ground, and as the outbreak progressed, we then voiced the player’s concerns to the leagues which resulted in training being suspended at all clubs.

“We wanted to ensure the necessary steps were taken to ensure football was taking responsibility to do its part in reducing the potential for spreading the virus. It was quickly obvious that the wider implications of the pandemic were more important than football.

“Understandably, with the season subsequently on hiatus, the players’ and clubs’ financial positions then became a priority issue.

“We had an initial meeting with the Premier League and EFL on Monday 23rd March. At this point, our attention was mainly focused on EFL players - particularly League One and League Two - as their need was most urgent.

“Here, a significant number of players are employed on a relatively short-term basis, with 12-month contracts and salaries closer to the national average. As such, many of these players will have contracts ending in June. These are often people with young families, for whom their immediate financial position is uncertain.

“As the month progressed, we saw first-hand correspondence from multiple EFL clubs telling players that they needed to immediately sign paperwork in order to receive March’s salary. In several instances, this was sent the day before the squads were due to be paid.

“Players were being asked to agree to a range of terms including furloughs, deferrals and, in some cases, pay cuts. For some, this constituted a legal change to their contract that would have standing beyond the resumption of football.

“As the players’ union, we have a duty of care to our members and advised that players should not sign any contractual amendments, particularly when being put under significant pressure, without being fully informed.

“In addition, there was no consistency from clubs with regard to wording and the terms being offered. This meant the PFA was dealing with a high number of differing cases in a short space of time.

“Contrary to some press reports, the PFA has never stated that it will block all wage deferrals. What we have sought to put in place is a structured and unified approach to ensure a fair response across the leagues.

“To address this, we called for an urgent meeting with the Premier League and EFL - which took place on Friday 27th March. The PFA’s primary aim was to ensure that wages for EFL players were protected for that month, this was agreed.

“In addition, a timetable was established to collectively use early April, to reach considered decisions and solutions, with a view for any potential changes and reductions to salaries coming into effect on April’s payroll. Talks on this basis are ongoing.

“Each club’s financial standing will vary. We are aware of the public sentiment that the players should pay non-playing staff’s salaries. However, our current position is that – as businesses - if clubs can afford to pay their players and staff, they should.

“The players we have spoken recognise that the non-playing staff are a vital part of their club and they do not want to see club staff furloughed unfairly. Any use of the government’s support schemes without genuine financial need is detrimental to the wider society.

“In instances where clubs have the resources to pay all staff, the benefit of players paying non-playing staff salaries will only serve the business of the club’s shareholders.

“We understand the severity of the situation and the challenges that clubs from all divisions face. We have requested, via the leagues, that clubs provide us with information about their financial position, so that we can make informed decisions for the future – both immediate and long-term.

“While we have a remit to protect our members, throughout our history, we have also done our utmost to protect the wider game. There are a large number of clubs within English football who would simply no longer exist without the PFA’s support. We have often been the organisation to pick up the pieces when clubs hit financial difficulty.

“We fully accept that players will have to be flexible and share the financial burden of the Covid-19 outbreak in order to secure the long-term future of their own club and indeed the wider game. Our advice going out to players at this point reflects that expectation. In addition, the PFA is also expecting to contribute financially to any solutions agreed upon.

“Like everyone else in the country, we are trying to deal with a situation that has never been faced. Our spirits have been lifted seeing communities come together to support each other.

“We have been proud to see many of our own members and clubs step up to support the NHS, to help children who would usually benefit from free school meals, donating to food banks and other charitable donations to those affected by this crisis. Much of this has been done privately and without publicity.

“We are hoping to reach an agreement with the Premier League and EFL that secures the long-term future of the clubs and protects players.

“As an industry, we are in discussions with clubs and players to identify the support we can give to our country during this difficult time.”


Photo: Action Images



Please report offensive, libellous or inappropriate posts by using the links provided.



allezlesbleus added 08:25 - Apr 3
When a Premier League player can earn more per year in wages than what a club the size of Ipswich take in annual turnover, that shows why football is killing itself.

The Premier League is the worst thing that ever happened to English football......and I would still say that if we were in the PL.
11

Radlett_blue added 08:33 - Apr 3
Continuing to pay Premier League players an average of £3.5m a year, while putting non playing staff on furlough in order to get the taxpayer to fund them is not an attractive sight. While there are contractual issues, how come many clubs in Europe have imposed pay freezes or cuts e.g. Barcelona's taking a 70% pay cut?
7

ChateauWines added 09:49 - Apr 3
Football needs to look very carefully at the bigger picture and how the rest of the country looks at it, in particular its supporters. The government 80% scheme was designed assist businesses that could not afford to retain staff through this period, Tottenham, Newcastle and Norwich, indeed even us are not those if continuing to pay its playing staff. I understand that in football, players are club assets, but this all leaves a very unpleasant taste in the mouth.
4

Edmundo added 10:06 - Apr 3
It's the beginning of the end for overpaid Premier League "stars". We can see who most of them are now: vacuous, self obsessed, non entities. The true stars are out there helping to keep the world going, saving lives and looking out for the vulnerable.
5

oldtimer added 10:20 - Apr 3
Growing up in a world when star footballers only earned a living wage, some needing a second job to pay the bills, how many people on this forum would like to go back to that?
Do you think that a front line doctor should be paid much less than a premiership footballer?
Or that a nurse should earn much less than a third tier footballer?
I know that just ain’t gonna happen, but I wish that it could.
Same goes for most celebrity pay too. Lineker and co are not saving lives
5

slade1 added 10:58 - Apr 3
oldtimer….that is one of the most sensible posts I have read on here for years.
I agree with you 100%
2

slade1 added 11:04 - Apr 3
Enmundo, spot on.
Premier league players (and also other world leagues) are paid a ridicules amount of money, and for what? Kicking a ball.
Nurses, doctors, carers etc in comparison earn a pittance.
I think there is something seriously wrong there.
Isn't it about time there was a wage cap on footballers? eg. a maximum wage for the premier league, a maximum wage for the Championship, league one, leugue two and so on.
2

dirtydingusmagee added 12:29 - Apr 3
one good thing could come out of this gloom , football ,in particular the Prem, is brought down to earth, its long overdue, Sky and the likes too. Let the greedy over paid beg for a change .
4

oldtimer3 added 19:33 - Apr 3
I still can't believe these premiership players will not support the operating staff at their clubs. Many people our pulling out all the stops during this awful time. Not these overpaid players it seams. No more BT Sports or Sky sports for me after all this. Like to think the BBC would cancel Match of the day next season and the millions they would save go to the key workers some risking their lives of others.
We have to pay the TV license and I for one don't wish to support greedy players.







0


You need to login in order to post your comments

Blogs 270 bloggers

Ipswich Town Polls

About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2020