Town and Swansea are reported to have loan approaches for defender Stephen Mfuni turned down by Manchester City.

Mfuni, 17, plays as a centre-half or a left-back and has been capped by England at U16 and U17 levels.

According to Italian journalist Fabrizio Romano, the Blues and Swans have had loan proposals turned down by City, who are said to want to keep him for both the short and long term.

Wigan-born Mfuni is yet to make a senior competitive appearance but featured in pre-season ahead of 2024/25.

Central defence looks the area of the squad where the Blues are most likely to add before Monday’s 7pm deadline with Luke Woolfenden potentially moving on. Watford, Coventry and Stoke are among the clubs keen on the 26-year-old.

Elsewhere, Town are claimed to have shown interest in Sheffield Wednesday forward Bailey Cadamarteri, son of former Bradford, Everton and Leeds frontman Danny.

According to the Sheffield Star, Sheffield United and Blackburn have made bids for the 20-year-old, while Town and Preston are also claimed to have made contact.

The Blues would appear well covered for attacking players since the signings of Sindre Walle Egeli and Ivan Azon following the additions of Chuba Akpom and Kasey McAteer.

Photo: IMAGO/Sportimage via Reuters Connect

Cookieboy added 11:47 - Aug 31 On what I have seen from the later part of last season and the beginning of this. The Town needs a quality left back that can defend. Oh how much we will miss Townsend
6

jas0999 added 12:07 - Aug 31 We don’t need any more loans. Four is more than enough.
3

cartman1972 added 12:30 - Aug 31 We do not need a 17 yr old loanee.....he's hardly likely to ever play
3

Gforce added 13:29 - Aug 31 May as well keep Baggott ,rather than a 17 year old kid. At least Baggott has a fair amount of 1st team experience, albeit at league 1 level.
3

Mark added 13:30 - Aug 31 I don't like the idea of the Mfuni loan. Surely Johnson or Young could cover left-back if Davis gets injured or suspended. Cadamarteri, well, Sheffield Wednesday's situation could lead to a few bargains for other clubs. I wouldn't be adverse to signing a 20 year old striker if he cost around £1m. Whoever we sign though, we need to get them to play together, develop understandings and deliver wins.

1

darkhorse28 added 13:41 - Aug 31 Cookieboy, totally agree, Townsend defending against Forest away was superb, a level above Leif, in that skill at least. But how can you say we miss him when Leif is fit? He’d be warming the bench like he did the time he was available.., McKenna doesn’t prioritise defending ability, he wants Leifs left wand, irrespective of form. So we really don’t miss what McKenna wouldn’t ever pick. He wouldn’t even rotate.., worked in 23/24 but this season Leif like many others has gone massively backwards under the supreme coach.

-1

timetraveler added 13:45 - Aug 31 Let’s not forget a 17-20 year old doesn’t count towards our squad limit so if they are backup then a vital squad place isn’t used. We could have the scenario of O’Shea greaves kipre and Baggott as centre backs with furlong covering in an emergency and a loanee under 21 centre back as additional cover
3

Jonathan_Charles added 13:47 - Aug 31 Not sure how reliable or current any interest in Mfuni, although he wouldn't count to our squad size and McKenna STILL has a reputation for player development...even if he is starting to lose his reputation for producing winning teams... the appointment of a STRIKER and not a winger or number 10 should still be a priority... Hirst isnt up to the job!!!
1

blueoutlook added 14:14 - Aug 31 We don’t need a kid who is going to sit on the bench at best. He simply isn’t going to get game time. Another striker however would be a good idea. If we could poach him for a million or even one and a half million,could be good business.
1

ernie added 14:38 - Aug 31 We have enough players now, just teach them to play together ffs
5

December1963 added 15:09 - Aug 31 Just an observation from the two home games played so far. Davis is an attacking wing back in the way that a modern wing back plays, when we were last in the championship when he went forward massimo would come across and fill that space behind him that’s not happening with the new midfield also with Jayden playing wide left he takes up that area (usually with a defender with him) that Davis likes to run into so both of these issues are really detrimental to how we are used to seeing him play.

0

Lennie added 15:16 - Aug 31 Only area we seem short is no10 … could do with a more physical Chaplin … is that Akpom or Sindre … not sure Smodiks has the vision … otherwise agree with those who say we now need to build culture of togetherness and mutual support on and off the pitch…COYB
1

Mark added 15:26 - Aug 31 > Let’s not forget a 17-20 year old doesn’t count towards our squad limit so if they are backup then a vital squad place isn’t used. I belive they do count if on loan.
0

chepstowblue added 16:01 - Aug 31 I no longer trust the process. At the moment it's a bl**dy mess.
0

trevski_s added 16:51 - Aug 31 This is one loan I don't think we need, I would rather keep Baggott instead of loaning him out again considering he's just signed a new contract too. I don't see the point in loaning in a really young player if he's just going to be a bench warmer (probably not even that as Baggott doesn't even make the bench), it's really not going to help his development. And in relation to an earlier post yes loaned players under 21 do count to the squad limit so it would be a pointless swap and we may as well use our own youth players. Even if Woolfy goes and without Townsend for the season, I believe we have more than enough cover at the back considering you have RB - Johnson, Furlong, Clarke, Young (O Shea and Kipre can also play here if needed) CB - O Shea, Greaves, Baggott, Kipre (and I think McKenna said Furlong can play here too) LB - Davis, Young, Johnson, Furlong (Greaves and Kipre can also play here if needed) And thats not including the likes of Boniface from the U21 who can play LB

5

PortmanTerrorist added 17:28 - Aug 31 Suspect the appeal is cos he does not count to squad numbers but could be good enough to contribute. Can't see how he improves us in any way tho. We don't give our own youngsters a chance so why do this ? Ashton promised we would not train youngsters for other Clubs any more, but Azon looks to break with that already.
0

blues1 added 21:21 - Aug 31 Lennie. We,dont need any more no.10s. Agree with you about Chaplin, but we also have Szmodics, Akpom and Egeli can play there too. Could also play thr like of Taylor or Nunez in there. So we're well covered there.
3

Lightningboy added 21:42 - Aug 31 Anyone know what the turnover in players has been since the summer of 2024? Must be approaching 40? (Ridiculous) How are "our" kids ever going to break through if we keep bringing in other teams kids on loan.
0

armchaircritic59 added 00:51 - Sep 1 Here's something I thought I'd throw into the mix, regarding any possibility of any other transfers in. JC and MN both have a history of injuries and needing recovery time. What if it happens to both at the same time? Entirely possible. Oh and one other thing, other than GH, who seems to be finding things a bit tough just now and himself is injury prone, we still do not have an out and out striker, half a team of number tens, sure, fox in the box? Maybe Azon? Maybe not. Just throwing them out there.

1

WorcesterBlue added 07:44 - Sep 1 I have no idea what the plan is with signings etc but it appears the hierarchy believe that McK can get promoted with the current squad so let’s see. Like many others I am not convinced by how we’ve gone about recruitment over the past 15 months or some of the inflexibility shown by the Manager. I feel we are more bothered about building an asset to sell than building a team to win with Philogene signing a prime example. If we can sign a CB who is an Upgrade on Woolfie (assuming he is going) let’s sign them and play them as the current CB pairing is nowhere near as good as it is made out to be and we need challenge for them. Plus Jordon James if we can in Cm. if we can get them I’d be happpier. But let’s give it til Christmas and see if there is a plan and that it is working.

1

StowTractor added 12:34 - Sep 1 ArmchairCritic Perfect comment. There is no doubt that we have upgraded both the Central Midfield and Striker positions in the last few days but we still have fitness issues in both areas & loss of form of Hirst in the striker role too. Would love the Hackney deal to get resurrected or Brownhill to opt for Town but neither is likely now. Jordan James & Bailey Cadamarteri would be good options that wont count in the squad limits.

0

Blogs 299 bloggers

Ipswich Town Polls