Paul Cook 17:51 - Dec 10 with 8388 views | pennblue | stands head and shoulders above any of the candidates being bandied about Just saying | |
| | |
Paul Cook on 17:52 - Dec 10 with 3359 views | footers | He failed here having been given everything he asked for and more. Just sayin' | |
| |
Paul Cook on 17:53 - Dec 10 with 3341 views | J2BLUE | Wait and see who is appointed. Right now I would agree. It was time for Cook to go IMO but if we replace him with Harris then I don't see the point. | |
| |
Paul Cook on 17:53 - Dec 10 with 3336 views | pennblue |
Paul Cook on 17:52 - Dec 10 by footers | He failed here having been given everything he asked for and more. Just sayin' |
Lol - ‘he failed here’ You made me laugh out loud | |
| |
Paul Cook on 17:54 - Dec 10 with 3333 views | positivity | not mogga, but i'd definitely take him above most of the rest. even now! | |
| |
Paul Cook on 17:55 - Dec 10 with 3289 views | Herbivore | Does he though? He has a good CV but he did a terrible job here. If any of the managers suggested comes in and does better then your point will be falsified. It's probably best to wait and see how any new manager actually performs here before making proclamations about how much better Paul Cook is. CVs don't always equate to how managers go on to perform in a particular role. | |
| |
Paul Cook on 17:55 - Dec 10 with 3316 views | jayessess | Paul Lambert's credentials were better than Paul Cook's, what's your point? [Post edited 10 Dec 2021 17:59]
| |
| |
Paul Cook on 17:56 - Dec 10 with 3296 views | Sawtrich | I'd only want him with Richardson as assistant, he messed up his last job without him. | | | |
Paul Cook on 17:58 - Dec 10 with 3280 views | footers |
Paul Cook on 17:53 - Dec 10 by pennblue | Lol - ‘he failed here’ You made me laugh out loud |
Read the league table. What can't speak can't lie. | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Paul Cook on 17:58 - Dec 10 with 3252 views | Herbivore |
Paul Cook on 17:53 - Dec 10 by pennblue | Lol - ‘he failed here’ You made me laugh out loud |
What's funny about him failing here? | |
| |
Paul Cook on 18:01 - Dec 10 with 3250 views | pennblue |
Paul Cook on 17:55 - Dec 10 by jayessess | Paul Lambert's credentials were better than Paul Cook's, what's your point? [Post edited 10 Dec 2021 17:59]
|
Funny you mention Lambert, given the situation he is working with I think he did ok Maybe we should get him back | |
| |
Paul Cook on 18:03 - Dec 10 with 3203 views | Herbivore |
Paul Cook on 18:01 - Dec 10 by pennblue | Funny you mention Lambert, given the situation he is working with I think he did ok Maybe we should get him back |
Are you a budgie? You seem to be a massive fan of managers that have taken Ipswich backwards. | |
| |
Paul Cook on 18:04 - Dec 10 with 3214 views | jayessess |
Paul Cook on 18:01 - Dec 10 by pennblue | Funny you mention Lambert, given the situation he is working with I think he did ok Maybe we should get him back |
Yeah, yeah, we've never had any poor managers, they all just inadvertently recruited all these terrible players who couldn't possibly be made into a decent team. | |
| |
Paul Cook on 18:05 - Dec 10 with 3200 views | positivity |
Paul Cook on 17:55 - Dec 10 by jayessess | Paul Lambert's credentials were better than Paul Cook's, what's your point? [Post edited 10 Dec 2021 17:59]
|
you think? when would you say lambert last had a successful job? i think cook's credentials are much stronger now than lambert's | |
| |
Paul Cook on 18:06 - Dec 10 with 3192 views | Asa | At the moment we are being linked to out of work managers who may have applied and the logical targets like Manning, Lowe (pre-Preston), Rowe etc and ambitious ones like Lampard and Terry. We are not going to be linked to any of the number of decent managers currently in jobs here and abroad because of the way Ashton operates. How many of the 19 signings were known until they were imminent. Not many. I really took to Cook. But ultimately he’s failed to get a tune out of what should be the cream of this division, over half a season, having effectively been able to bring in his own entire squad. Whatever reason for it not working, Cook has been given a leg up most managers can only dream of and still failed dismally. [Post edited 10 Dec 2021 18:16]
| | | |
Paul Cook on 18:06 - Dec 10 with 3178 views | J2BLUE |
Paul Cook on 18:01 - Dec 10 by pennblue | Funny you mention Lambert, given the situation he is working with I think he did ok Maybe we should get him back |
LOL | |
| |
Paul Cook on 18:07 - Dec 10 with 3165 views | bazza | I thought he was a timotei man myself… | | | |
Paul Cook on 18:08 - Dec 10 with 3164 views | BlueandTruesince82 |
Paul Cook on 17:52 - Dec 10 by footers | He failed here having been given everything he asked for and more. Just sayin' |
Everything accept time | |
| |
Paul Cook on 18:09 - Dec 10 with 3130 views | footers |
He only needed one transfer window to get it right, according to him. He didn't. Now he's not here. | |
| |
Paul Cook on 18:12 - Dec 10 with 3056 views | Herbivore |
Paul Cook on 18:09 - Dec 10 by footers | He only needed one transfer window to get it right, according to him. He didn't. Now he's not here. |
Indeed. I also think after 9 months it's not asking too much to see some signs of improvement. The last few performances under him were as bad as the drab performances at the tail end of last season. We're midtable in League 1, it's not like he was doing a mediocre job and got the flick too soon, he was failing. | |
| |
Paul Cook on 18:13 - Dec 10 with 3066 views | Mullet | He was sh1te. We might never know why, how or even the what for. But please stop pretending we’ve had a decent manager since certain types hounded the last one out. Cook has more to spend and more resources then anyone could ask for and he failed. Dismally. | |
| |
Paul Cook on 18:14 - Dec 10 with 3039 views | jayessess |
Paul Cook on 18:05 - Dec 10 by positivity | you think? when would you say lambert last had a successful job? i think cook's credentials are much stronger now than lambert's |
I just think if we're talking career achievements then Lambert's promotion from the Championship and survival seasons in the Premier League trump Cook's lower league promotions. At some point he lost it and those past achievements were irrelevant, which is my point really. | |
| |
Paul Cook on 18:15 - Dec 10 with 3021 views | pointofblue | Paul Cook stands head and shoulders above all other candidates… Had an absolute nightmare in his last job though. | |
| |
Paul Cook on 18:19 - Dec 10 with 2954 views | Trequartista | If there was a candidate with an identical record to Cook before he joined Ipswich, yes they would be the best candidate. But it didn't work here for Cook. So all this tells me is that apart from the obvious no-nos, i really don't mind who gets the job, and just pray they can succeed where so many others have failed. | |
| |
Paul Cook on 18:20 - Dec 10 with 2947 views | footers |
Paul Cook on 18:12 - Dec 10 by Herbivore | Indeed. I also think after 9 months it's not asking too much to see some signs of improvement. The last few performances under him were as bad as the drab performances at the tail end of last season. We're midtable in League 1, it's not like he was doing a mediocre job and got the flick too soon, he was failing. |
Even as someone who was willing to dismiss last season's results and performances, and to give him a clean slate, it was clear it wasn't working bar a few freak results. I liked him as a bloke and wish him well, but he can't really have any excuses with being dismissed. The coaching team were probably as much of an issue as anything else. Whatever the case may be, he failed. That much is clear. Why some persist with this love-in is beyond me. | |
| |
Paul Cook on 18:22 - Dec 10 with 2919 views | pennblue |
Paul Cook on 18:09 - Dec 10 by footers | He only needed one transfer window to get it right, according to him. He didn't. Now he's not here. |
A few mistakes were made for sure. | |
| |
| |