Forum | Formation... by Pendejo

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Formation... 16:14 - Feb 4 with 624 views

As we're on a trip to a level of football last charted by us in the 50s, how about a 50s style formation 4-2-4 or the like, no tracking back from the front four and then at least when the big boot punts forward we'd have a chance of retaining possession.

Also, I'd like to apologise for the defeat Saturday, all my fault I'm afraid. I was wearing the same sweatshirt I wore to Rotherham for first away game of season. The game that started all this rot. I promise not to wear it on a match day again.

	uberima fides
Poll:	Start a new job tomorrow - which suit?

Formation... on 19:39 - Feb 4 with 565 views

SonOfSpock

2 3 5.

Jumpers for goalposts..

Formation... on 19:41 - Feb 4 with 558 views

GlasgowBlue

In that case we should be launching our new home shirt to celebrate.

	Iron Lion Zion
Poll:	Our best central defensive partnership?
Blog:	[Blog] For the Sake of My Football Club, Please Go

Formation... on 19:42 - Feb 4 with 558 views

noggin

Formation... on 19:39 - Feb 4 by SonOfSpock
2 3 5. Jumpers for goalposts..

Headers and volleys.

Poll:

Which team thread should I participate in?

Formation... on 20:12 - Feb 4 with 540 views

Pecker

4-4-2 is always the best way to play football. 5 defend, 5 attack.

Formation... on 20:29 - Feb 4 with 517 views

monty_radio

4-2-4- more a thing of the sixties. Brazil used it first at the 1958 W.Cup.

So naturally didn't reach Suffolk till a bit later.

We might have something of a patent on 6-3-1 though.

Blog:

Too Many Suspects? â€“ A Swede Ramble

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread