Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
FFP 13:43 - Feb 11 with 643 viewsFrimleyBlue

Does it exist in league 1?


Poll: Do you think the squad itself is good enough to stay up
Blog: Marcus Evans Needs Our Support Not to Be Hounded Out

0

FFP on 13:43 - Feb 11 with 643 viewsTractorCam

Doesn't exist in the championship does it?
3

FFP on 13:46 - Feb 11 with 617 viewsalexharban

Yes, think it’s more or less the same principles regarding losses over a three year period.

There’s also a rule that wages cannot be more than 60% of a clubs turnover, although owners investements count as turnover in this instance.

TWTD Participant
Poll: Who's Worse?

0
FFP on 13:52 - Feb 11 with 585 viewsGuthrum

FFP on 13:43 - Feb 11 by TractorCam

Doesn't exist in the championship does it?


Yes. It's now a certain loss over a rolling three-year period. Plus the penalties have been tightened up and are being enforced (mainly transfer bans or restrictions, tho points deductions can also be made).

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

0
FFP on 16:35 - Feb 11 with 496 viewsbritbiker

FFP on 13:52 - Feb 11 by Guthrum

Yes. It's now a certain loss over a rolling three-year period. Plus the penalties have been tightened up and are being enforced (mainly transfer bans or restrictions, tho points deductions can also be made).


I thought there was also some clause regarding recently signed players whereby some of the wages didnt count otherwise every team relegated would be penalised as they are not always able to shift a player on high wages .
0
FFP on 18:01 - Feb 11 with 410 viewsPinewoodblue

FFP on 13:52 - Feb 11 by Guthrum

Yes. It's now a certain loss over a rolling three-year period. Plus the penalties have been tightened up and are being enforced (mainly transfer bans or restrictions, tho points deductions can also be made).


Since we are allowed to lose £13m a year in Championship, and after allowable expenditure, we are currently losing less than half the allowable amount. We can keep within FFP for a. Couple of years before we are in danger of a breach.

Poll: How many changes to starting eleven for game against Millwall?

0
FFP on 19:14 - Feb 11 with 323 viewsGuthrum

FFP on 16:35 - Feb 11 by britbiker

I thought there was also some clause regarding recently signed players whereby some of the wages didnt count otherwise every team relegated would be penalised as they are not always able to shift a player on high wages .


For teams relegated to L1, I'm pretty sure there is some leeway initially.

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

0
FFP on 19:18 - Feb 11 with 313 viewsbournemouthblue

FFP on 13:46 - Feb 11 by alexharban

Yes, think it’s more or less the same principles regarding losses over a three year period.

There’s also a rule that wages cannot be more than 60% of a clubs turnover, although owners investements count as turnover in this instance.


It's 75% for sides relegated from the Championship for a season or two which would put us at an advantage

Presumably our turnover would be one of the highest in that league also?

The club really have to get season ticket prices this summer, we desperately need respectable crowds if we are to have any real advantage compared to the rest

Alcohol is the answer but I can't remember the question!
Poll: So how likely is it Taylor will need surgery?

0
FFP on 19:18 - Feb 11 with 309 viewsGuthrum

FFP on 18:01 - Feb 11 by Pinewoodblue

Since we are allowed to lose £13m a year in Championship, and after allowable expenditure, we are currently losing less than half the allowable amount. We can keep within FFP for a. Couple of years before we are in danger of a breach.


It's £39m over three years, on a rolling basis. So if, say, we lost £5m and £4m, then the following season we could theoretically run up losses of £30m without falling foul. Would have to be very careful for the two years after that, tho, as that figure would still be part of the calculation.

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

0
Login to get fewer ads


FFP on 19:20 - Feb 11 with 299 viewsbraveblue

Marcus will introduce it if not. It’s his main excuse for everything.
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2019