Why should Prince Andrew.. 23:01 - Jan 27 with 6612 views | Girthyguy | Face his alleged crimes in the US when Anne Sacoolas won't face her crime and the Americans won't hand her over? Not sticking up for Prince Andrew in anyway but it's a bit of a joke right. Justice should be done both ways. Not one rule for one and one for another. Anyone else think the same? |  | | |  |
Why should Prince Andrew.. on 10:16 - Jan 28 with 505 views | LeoMuff |
Why should Prince Andrew.. on 10:07 - Jan 28 by ElephantintheRoom | Erm - isn't enough to have a needy american soap actress in the royal family without giving american ambulance chasers an open invitation? The alleged incidents are hardly the same. On the one hand some american woman driving on the wrong side of the road.... presumably not deliberately - most would consider that an accident that a vindictive court case will do little to improve the lot of the dead lad, nor stop her driving on the wrong side again... and we are short of places in prison etc etc On the other a raft of young girls who may or may not have been happy at the time to trade good looks for favours... now smelling hard cash with the assistance of grubby lawyers.... and if there were crimes going on how come no parents were shouting at the time etc etc. A bit like what is going on on every superyacht moored up in the med right now. |
Some pretty sick views right there... |  |
|  |
Why should Prince Andrew.. on 10:17 - Jan 28 with 505 views | BlueBadger |
Why should Prince Andrew.. on 10:07 - Jan 28 by ElephantintheRoom | Erm - isn't enough to have a needy american soap actress in the royal family without giving american ambulance chasers an open invitation? The alleged incidents are hardly the same. On the one hand some american woman driving on the wrong side of the road.... presumably not deliberately - most would consider that an accident that a vindictive court case will do little to improve the lot of the dead lad, nor stop her driving on the wrong side again... and we are short of places in prison etc etc On the other a raft of young girls who may or may not have been happy at the time to trade good looks for favours... now smelling hard cash with the assistance of grubby lawyers.... and if there were crimes going on how come no parents were shouting at the time etc etc. A bit like what is going on on every superyacht moored up in the med right now. |
You're so edgy that I cut myself reading that. |  |
|  |
Why should Prince Andrew.. on 11:34 - Jan 28 with 449 views | Oxford_Blue |
Why should Prince Andrew.. on 08:31 - Jan 28 by itfcjoe | Regardless, there is surely no one who thinks that she shouldn't face justice for running over and killing a kid whilst driving on the wrong side of the road. Diplomatic immunity is surely there to protect you if your job leads you down a certain road, not for your partner to act with impunity |
People keep saying “face justice”. But under the law, she has immunity. So justice is about the rule of law and she is I am afraid operating within it. It’s morally bankrupt - but then what is the point of the rule of law if not to set out what we deem to be acceptable or not. |  | |  |
Why should Prince Andrew.. on 11:40 - Jan 28 with 444 views | No9 | "Face his alleged crimes in the US when Anne Sacoolas won't face her crime and the Americans won't hand her over?" Because the brexiters have given away their desperation for a "Trump trade deal" - no matter how bad. Desperate people do desperate things Nor forgetting of course how Reagan shafted Thatcher governments |  | |  |
| |