Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Judge must come off for a striker! (n/t) 15:53 - Dec 12 with 391 viewsITFC_96

0
Judge must come off for a striker! (n/t) on 15:54 - Dec 12 with 381 viewsMetal_Hacker

Just take him off , wouldn’t be missed even without replacing him.

Poll: If it were one or the other

1
Judge must come off for a striker! (n/t) on 15:55 - Dec 12 with 354 viewsstiff_talking

Judge must come off for a striker! (n/t) on 15:54 - Dec 12 by Metal_Hacker

Just take him off , wouldn’t be missed even without replacing him.


Another poor half. And why is the wee man near free kicks ?
0
Judge must come off for a striker! (n/t) on 16:03 - Dec 12 with 315 viewsmattyhollandsirish

Judge must come off for a striker! (n/t) on 15:54 - Dec 12 by Metal_Hacker

Just take him off , wouldn’t be missed even without replacing him.


Indeed. No need to even replace. At least we then don't have to put up with this "experienced pro" constantly losing the ball and being completely incapable of anything other than dreadful dead ball deliveries.
0
Judge must come off for a striker! (n/t) on 16:04 - Dec 12 with 300 viewsBanksterDebtSlave

Whereas Lankester has.....

"They break our legs and tell us to be grateful when they offer us crutches."
Poll: If the choice is Moore or no more.

0
Judge must come off for a striker! (n/t) on 16:14 - Dec 12 with 267 viewsJeff_winger

Judge must come off for a striker! (n/t) on 16:04 - Dec 12 by BanksterDebtSlave

Whereas Lankester has.....


Was going to say the same clearly Lancaster is the change that is needed.
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2024