Quantcast
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Was it 442 or 4231 today? 17:17 - Feb 20 with 222 viewsHullblue

Spared myself from watching it. Phil and the BBC described it as 4231 while a few others called it 442. Quite a funny climb down if it was 442! Didn’t know Parrott could play as a 10 if it was 4231.

Blog: Sleep is the Cousin of Life

0

0-0 mate. (n/t) on 17:18 - Feb 20 with 216 viewsBloots


“We don’t put crosses in the box, we don’t create chances, we don’t defend well, we don’t defend set pieces well, we don’t retain possession of the ball, we’re not very fit, we’re not very athletic. You can write a list of what we’re not really good at." - Paul Cook 16/04/21

3

Was it 442 or 4231 today? on 17:19 - Feb 20 with 200 viewsITFCMonk

4231 with Parrott behind Norwood. A sackable decision for me.
[Post edited 20 Feb 17:32]
0
0-0 mate. (n/t) on 17:21 - Feb 20 with 166 viewsSwansea_Blue

0-0 mate. (n/t) on 17:18 - Feb 20 by Bloots



The main question is who won the possession points.

Poll: So then cake aficionados, which is your favourite part of Battenberg?

0

Was it 442 or 4231 today? on 17:22 - Feb 20 with 154 viewsCokeIsKey

It was a 4-4-1-1 with Parrott behind Norwood.

Poll: Should Lambert continue as the Ipswich Town manager?

0

Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2021