By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Fairly sure they just have a different outlook to you Mr Angry. It's what makes us human.
[Post edited 23 Aug 2021 17:26]
Lots of people have different outlooks. It is when they have baseless, dangerous views that they try to push on others that it is completely unacceptable.
Anyone could say the Taliban or Adolf Hitler simply have/had different outlooks on life. It doesn't mean they are not dangerous people who need opposing in their aims.
Lots of people have different outlooks. It is when they have baseless, dangerous views that they try to push on others that it is completely unacceptable.
Anyone could say the Taliban or Adolf Hitler simply have/had different outlooks on life. It doesn't mean they are not dangerous people who need opposing in their aims.
[Post edited 23 Aug 2021 22:38]
Interestingly Adolf found some humans subhuman too.
Edit...furthermore I think people have the right to protest about the 'vaccine passport' issue.
[Post edited 23 Aug 2021 23:07]
"They break our legs and tell us to be grateful when they offer us crutches."
Interestingly Adolf found some humans subhuman too.
Edit...furthermore I think people have the right to protest about the 'vaccine passport' issue.
[Post edited 23 Aug 2021 23:07]
Indeed. Didn't say I agreed with Badger's terminology at all. However, I want to point out that it is wrong to accept all alternative views as valid and reasonable. There is a point where some views need to be rigorously opposed regardless of how genuinely some people might hold them. This is due to the unreasonable nature of the views and the outcome of holding them.
Indeed. Didn't say I agreed with Badger's terminology at all. However, I want to point out that it is wrong to accept all alternative views as valid and reasonable. There is a point where some views need to be rigorously opposed regardless of how genuinely some people might hold them. This is due to the unreasonable nature of the views and the outcome of holding them.
No problem with that.
"They break our legs and tell us to be grateful when they offer us crutches."
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
