| Sounds a bad one for Burgess 22:28 - Sep 13 with 3922 views | Wallingford_Boy |
Fridge back in Saturday then. |  |
| |  |
| Sounds a bad one for Burgess on 11:28 - Sep 14 with 450 views | Exiled2Surrey |
| Sounds a bad one for Burgess on 11:14 - Sep 14 by SheffordBlue |
McK really likes to have WB options off the bench which would be the downside to this. |
Agree, but could have any of KVY / Edwards / Humphreys to freshen it up?
Anyway, all a bit of a fantasy.... |  | | |
| Sounds a bad one for Burgess on 21:48 - Sep 15 with 335 views | BigCommon |
| Sounds a bad one for Burgess on 23:01 - Sep 13 by StokieBlue |
So based on 20 minutes playing against a team who barely got in our half you're declaring Ball a hard call against Edmondson, someone who might not have started amazingly but was involved in most of our solid defensive displays last season.
That's before we even mention Keogh.
As hot takes go, it's right up there with the very hottest.
SB [Post edited 13 Sep 2022 23:02]
|
Just have to wait and see. I mean, for some reason Fridge is out of favor atm. And from memory, Wednesday gave him a torrid time last season..
Keogh hasn't really featured either. He was nursing an injury when he came here. And hasn't played a full 90. So you'd have to question his match fitness against one of the toughest sides in the division.
I don't think it's a cut and dry decision.. We've got four possibles, in Keogh, Fridge, Ball and Leigh (5 if you include Davis).
We might even see a back 4 with 2 CB's, and 3 in MF.
We've seen some pretty left field selections already under KM. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
