Ipswich want old boy striker 07:43 - Nov 6 with 6685 views | leftback | Nixon reporting |  | | |  |
Ipswich want old boy striker on 11:44 - Nov 6 with 1258 views | BlueBadger | Nixon is only marginally more reliable than Maysixth in the Definite Info stakes. |  |
|  |
Ipswich want old boy striker on 11:45 - Nov 6 with 1255 views | BlueBadger |
Ipswich want old boy striker on 09:30 - Nov 6 by Broadhill | Can't see how Rhodes would fit in. We are about movement and hard press. He does neither. Static in the box most of the time. Keane would be ideal but can't see that happening, basically a non starter. |
Nixon has probably stolen this 'transfer gossip' from here after some started a thread about him yesterday. |  |
|  |
Ipswich want old boy striker on 12:53 - Nov 6 with 1172 views | chicoazul |
Ipswich want old boy striker on 10:37 - Nov 6 by Guthrum | But the point is not how good a marksman Rhodes is, but how he fits into the current setup. Would he be able to do the Ladapo hold-up role, or just lurk in the box* expecting "service"? * In League One, likely surrounded by four or five opponents. |
He’s be a great player to play for an hour or bring on for half an hour to do either or both of those things. The idea a 32yo Championship striker can’t hold the ball up is deranged. |  |
|  |
Ipswich want old boy striker on 15:16 - Nov 6 with 1036 views | Coastalblue |
Ipswich want old boy striker on 12:53 - Nov 6 by chicoazul | He’s be a great player to play for an hour or bring on for half an hour to do either or both of those things. The idea a 32yo Championship striker can’t hold the ball up is deranged. |
Sorry but you're miles off with this. He's never been a worker and is even less so now, he might be able to hold the ball up but it's unlikely he'd be seeing much of it anyway. I'm not disputing his qualities, but there's no way he fits in with the way we play. |  |
|  |
Ipswich want old boy striker on 07:59 - Nov 7 with 823 views | chicoazul |
Ipswich want old boy striker on 15:16 - Nov 6 by Coastalblue | Sorry but you're miles off with this. He's never been a worker and is even less so now, he might be able to hold the ball up but it's unlikely he'd be seeing much of it anyway. I'm not disputing his qualities, but there's no way he fits in with the way we play. |
You think a forward with nearly 600 appearances doesn’t work hard? 🙄🙄🙄 |  |
|  |
Ipswich want old boy striker on 08:25 - Nov 7 with 784 views | NthQldITFC |
Ipswich want old boy striker on 07:59 - Nov 7 by chicoazul | You think a forward with nearly 600 appearances doesn’t work hard? 🙄🙄🙄 |
He'd be perfect in a different team, but utterly wrong for the way we play. You don't rip up the whole ethos of the squad because of the most basic data and simplistic interpretation imaginable. |  |
|  |
Ipswich want old boy striker on 08:39 - Nov 7 with 741 views | chicoazul |
Ipswich want old boy striker on 08:25 - Nov 7 by NthQldITFC | He'd be perfect in a different team, but utterly wrong for the way we play. You don't rip up the whole ethos of the squad because of the most basic data and simplistic interpretation imaginable. |
That may be true from a technical perspective although I am not sure I agree. I’m more amazed that TWTD thinks a player with 600 appearances is notorious for not working hard. Well I’m not amazed really as this is TWTD. |  |
|  |
Ipswich want old boy striker on 08:45 - Nov 7 with 706 views | Coastalblue |
Ipswich want old boy striker on 07:59 - Nov 7 by chicoazul | You think a forward with nearly 600 appearances doesn’t work hard? 🙄🙄🙄 |
I don't think he works hard enough for the team ethos no, I think he works hard for his own game, there's a huge difference, but this being you and TWTD then there's no surprise in you not recognising that. Nobody is arguing his ability and quality, rather questioning how that would dovetail into our team, and the reality is that without major changes to the way we play it wouldn't. |  |
|  |
| |