| Phil - what did you mean by this? 18:07 - Jan 6 with 1759 views | itfcJDP |
"No deal is currently under discussion landing Broadhead, who can play all across the front line, would not end Town’s pursuit of Whittaker."
I read it as there's no deal currently under discussion for whittaker, but landing Broadhead wouldn't end our pursuit. Is that right? |  | | |  |
| Phil - what did you mean by this? on 18:19 - Jan 6 with 1623 views | DavoIPB |
Surely that's no deal under discussion for broadhead. If we got broadhead it would not end our pursuit of whittaker | | | |
| Phil - what did you mean by this? on 18:26 - Jan 6 with 1570 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
| Phil - what did you mean by this? on 18:19 - Jan 6 by DavoIPB |
Surely that's no deal under discussion for broadhead. If we got broadhead it would not end our pursuit of whittaker |
Reading the article the context does look like it is Whittaker that is being referred to in the no deal under discussion part - suspect Phil has missed out either the word ‘and’ or ‘but’ before the word landing, and meaning that even if we do sign Broadhead we will remain interested in Whittaker aswell |  |
| |
| Phil - what did you mean by this? on 18:28 - Jan 6 with 1531 views | Pinewoodblue |
| Phil - what did you mean by this? on 18:19 - Jan 6 by DavoIPB |
Surely that's no deal under discussion for broadhead. If we got broadhead it would not end our pursuit of whittaker |
Broadhead and Whitaker would perform different roles..
Signing Broadhead might however end of interest in Hirst.
Phil's news story no one on A12 neither Broadhead nor Hirst would travel to Ipswich via A12. |  |
| |
| Phil - what did you mean by this? on 18:30 - Jan 6 with 1534 views | PhilTWTD |
Sorry, I retweaked that sentence and made it make even less sense by missing out the word but.
"No deal is currently under discussion but landing Broadhead, who can play all across the front line, would not end Town’s pursuit of Whittaker." |  | | |
| Phil - what did you mean by this? on 18:31 - Jan 6 with 1499 views | berkstractorboy |
| Phil - what did you mean by this? on 18:28 - Jan 6 by Pinewoodblue |
Broadhead and Whitaker would perform different roles..
Signing Broadhead might however end of interest in Hirst.
Phil's news story no one on A12 neither Broadhead nor Hirst would travel to Ipswich via A12. |
Even KMc giving the fans banter now with which road potential signings may arrive on! | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
