| Big Money signings 21:11 - Jan 15 with 7051 views | cressi |
Like most I thought this summer we may have broken our transfer record we have done exceptionally well considering we have not spent big.
My concern is we don't improve our first eleven but improve our squad understand ffp and all that but if money was spent now and we failed to go up we could sell a player in the summer to be within ffp. We may not get a better chance.
|  | | |  |
| Big Money signings on 11:09 - Jan 16 with 533 views | xrayspecs |
| Big Money signings on 10:54 - Jan 16 by Dennyx4 |
I guess it shows the benefit of a good academy. Chelsea are using theirs to get the full money onto the books in the current financial year.
If we are close to FFP, I guess it means Woolfenden is a valuable asset, that if sold would create instant value to help balance the books quickly.
I assume that is why Norwich sold Aaron’s and Ombiadele (sic) in the summer, money straight into the accounts. |
Yes, to all your points.
I would add that once the transfer fee has been paid (typically three years), then any fee is pure profit. It is where you still owe the original club monies, that you have to pay this off first, so reducing your profit. Ditto, any sell on agreements. | | | |
| Big Money signings on 11:32 - Jan 16 with 472 views | ChampionsofInnsbruck |
FFP has been a thing for years and still people think we can just blow the bank to get promoted.
We won't be spending big anytime soon, we'll be working within the rules and within our means. If Luton can do it, Ipswich can. |  | | |
| Big Money signings on 14:59 - Jan 16 with 341 views | hoppy |
| Big Money signings on 10:36 - Jan 16 by NthQldITFC |
I was a little concerned that no-one would see what I'd written myself. |
It's a daily worry... |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
