| Stonewall (n/t) 14:07 - Jan 27 with 3563 views | GlasgowBlue |
|  |
| |  |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 17:30 - Jan 27 with 479 views | TractorWood |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 16:55 - Jan 27 by pointofblue |
He didn't, but he still had an impact on the game which was biased towards Maidstone. |
28 attempts to 2. Talk to me. |  |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 17:31 - Jan 27 with 475 views | pointofblue |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 17:30 - Jan 27 by TractorWood |
28 attempts to 2. Talk to me. |
It was worse than that. 38 to 2. Possibly 39 to 1 if the ref had done his job properly. |  |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 17:33 - Jan 27 with 456 views | TractorWood |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 17:31 - Jan 27 by pointofblue |
It was worse than that. 38 to 2. Possibly 39 to 1 if the ref had done his job properly. |
To me this is like the bride not turning up for the wedding and blaming the vicar. | |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 17:33 - Jan 27 with 450 views | Crock |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 14:44 - Jan 27 by matteoblue |
Did he make contact? |
It didn’t look like that on the replay. |  |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 17:35 - Jan 27 with 436 views | pointofblue |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 17:33 - Jan 27 by TractorWood |
To me this is like the bride not turning up for the wedding and blaming the vicar. |
The ref wasn't the sole reason we lost today. Did he play a part in helping Maidstone through? Yes. | |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 17:37 - Jan 27 with 423 views | LankHenners |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 17:33 - Jan 27 by TractorWood |
To me this is like the bride not turning up for the wedding and blaming the vicar. |
The thread was started at the penalty shout so it's not unreasonable that the ref gets discussed in the rest of the thread. Bit tedious, and patronising, to keep chirping up with 'why are you all going on at the ref' stuff. |  |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 17:39 - Jan 27 with 402 views | TractorWood |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 17:37 - Jan 27 by LankHenners |
The thread was started at the penalty shout so it's not unreasonable that the ref gets discussed in the rest of the thread. Bit tedious, and patronising, to keep chirping up with 'why are you all going on at the ref' stuff. |
Pretty tinpot though with 38:2 shots against a non league team. No? | |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 18:56 - Jan 27 with 331 views | GeoffSentence |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 15:46 - Jan 27 by pointofblue |
It's even worse when you consider, for example, West Ham v Bristol City - had VAR in the first game but not the replay. Bristol City v Forest yesterday didn't have VAR but will for the replay. It's the same tie but the rules change.
Saying that, I'm not 100% sure whether VAR would have given a penalty to us. I do think it would have overturned Maidstone's second goal, though. |
May not have given a penalty, but surely Fridge's booking would have been overturned. Not that it makes feck all difference now we are out of the cup. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
