| Why doesn't Burns take on defenders any more? 14:04 - Feb 10 with 670 views | urbanblue |
Seems to continually play it back. |  | | |  |
| Why doesn't Burns take on defenders any more? on 14:15 - Feb 10 with 634 views | SuperKieranMcKenna |
Probably doesn’t want to lose possession, because our defence is about as solid as custard. |  | | |
| Why doesn't Burns take on defenders any more? on 14:18 - Feb 10 with 620 views | bournemouthblue |
He has dropped off massively since his haircut |  |
| |
| Why doesn't Burns take on defenders any more? on 14:48 - Feb 10 with 549 views | Rozz |
He's never been particularly keen to take on a man with skill or close control. His strength is to knock it past you and burn you for pace, which he can't do effectively in games like today's where there's an extra man covering in behind. |  | | |
| Why doesn't Burns take on defenders any more? on 14:49 - Feb 10 with 531 views | MalcolmBlue |
He’s lost his hair and his confidence |  |
| |
| Why doesn't Burns take on defenders any more? on 14:50 - Feb 10 with 517 views | urbanblue |
| Why doesn't Burns take on defenders any more? on 14:48 - Feb 10 by Rozz |
He's never been particularly keen to take on a man with skill or close control. His strength is to knock it past you and burn you for pace, which he can't do effectively in games like today's where there's an extra man covering in behind. |
Good point but that begs the question why not change it and bring Hutch on earlier. | | | |
| Why doesn't Burns take on defenders any more? on 14:52 - Feb 10 with 494 views | Joey_Joe_Joe_Junior |
That’s why Hutch on 55-60 minutes (latest) was the move for me. There was one instance in the second half Davis hit a lovely cross field ball and he had loads of space and just slowed it down. It was frustrating as we needed to kick on. Also poor a few times in the first half, heavy touch when the keeper presented it to him. |  | | |
| Why doesn't Burns take on defenders any more? on 14:55 - Feb 10 with 464 views | Rozz |
| Why doesn't Burns take on defenders any more? on 14:50 - Feb 10 by urbanblue |
Good point but that begs the question why not change it and bring Hutch on earlier. |
That's the golden question. You could see that Hutchinson had a good chance of being more effective in that position the way the game was going. | | | |
| Why doesn't Burns take on defenders any more? on 14:55 - Feb 10 with 464 views | urbanblue |
| Why doesn't Burns take on defenders any more? on 14:52 - Feb 10 by Joey_Joe_Joe_Junior |
That’s why Hutch on 55-60 minutes (latest) was the move for me. There was one instance in the second half Davis hit a lovely cross field ball and he had loads of space and just slowed it down. It was frustrating as we needed to kick on. Also poor a few times in the first half, heavy touch when the keeper presented it to him. |
I think when that Davis pass happened was when I wrote that post. I was screaming at the TV ... | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Why doesn't Burns take on defenders any more? on 14:57 - Feb 10 with 446 views | baxterbasics |
WBA organised their defence well today to keep our attack quiet.
I am ready to see Hutch start though. |  |
| |
| Why doesn't Burns take on defenders any more? on 14:58 - Feb 10 with 439 views | Joey_Joe_Joe_Junior |
| Why doesn't Burns take on defenders any more? on 14:55 - Feb 10 by urbanblue |
I think when that Davis pass happened was when I wrote that post. I was screaming at the TV ... |
I called for a Hutchinson start but was hoping worse case right after the break if he wasn’t at it again. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
