| Does anybody else think we should go back in for 17:08 - May 28 with 5816 views | itfc1108 |
Ellis Simms.
Gave Man Utd a torrid time, and really looked the part in the 2nd half of the season.
I can see him fitting into our system, and having a good battle with Hirst for a starting role. |  | | |  |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 09:02 - May 29 with 910 views | Keno |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:17 - May 28 by PhilTWTD |
He actually cost £3.5m, £8m was if he plays for England, scores the winning goal in the World Cup final, is first man on Mars etc. |
I guess that deal would give Everton a real bounty |  |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 09:03 - May 29 with 912 views | Kieran_Knows |
Wouldn't surprise me at all given our track record of going back in for players that we haven't got first time around. |  |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 09:32 - May 29 with 839 views | bluesym |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 09:03 - May 29 by Kieran_Knows |
Wouldn't surprise me at all given our track record of going back in for players that we haven't got first time around. |
I'm a fan of Simms. He's got all the right attributes and ticks all the right boxes in terms of how we recruit. |  |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 09:47 - May 29 with 805 views | backwaywhen |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 17:35 - May 28 by Clutch |
No - he's inconsistent, and can be super lazy. |
He reminds me of the Peterborough striker we considered , name escapes me ……so it’s a no from me . | | | |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 10:26 - May 29 with 758 views | Nutkins_Return |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 09:32 - May 29 by bluesym |
I'm a fan of Simms. He's got all the right attributes and ticks all the right boxes in terms of how we recruit. |
Define all the right attributes? Because I would say he has limited right attributes for the way we play.
Good fit: tall, strong.
Non fit: work rate very poor, mobility poor (does not press and I've seen him live many times), lacks pace.
Question marks: goalscoring. 13 league goals. Goals are what he offers and this was limited last season. Unlike Hirst who would be similar in goals he doesn't offer all the work rate and selfless running of Hirst.
He still has potential but I would really be concerned at how we could play a pressing/aggressive game with him. [Post edited 29 May 2024 11:34]
| |
| |
| Does anybody else think we should go back in for on 10:32 - May 29 with 743 views | cressi |
Joan Simms would be better. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
