Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Arf! (n/t) 21:30 - Jun 29 with 1050 viewsGlasgowBlue

edit. May be offside.
[Post edited 29 Jun 2024 21:31]

Hey now, hey now, don't dream it's over
Poll: What will be announced first?
Blog: [Blog] For the Sake of My Football Club, Please Go

0
Arf! (n/t) on 21:35 - Jun 29 with 1010 viewsIllinoisblue

That is a nonsense penalty

62 - 78 - 81
Poll: What sport is the most corrupt?

1
Arf! (n/t) on 21:37 - Jun 29 with 972 viewsRyorry

Arf! (n/t) on 21:35 - Jun 29 by Illinoisblue

That is a nonsense penalty


Really lucky lucky Germany.

Poll: Town's most cultured left foot ever?

1
Arf! (n/t) on 21:37 - Jun 29 with 968 viewsHerbivore

Arf! (n/t) on 21:35 - Jun 29 by Illinoisblue

That is a nonsense penalty


Nonsense disallowed goal for me as well. He's offside in the build up but not interfering with play at that stage, when the ball is played to him he's well onside. Game's gone.

Poll: Latest TWTD opinion poll - who are you voting for?
Blog: Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

1
Arf! (n/t) on 21:40 - Jun 29 with 929 viewsIllinoisblue

Arf! (n/t) on 21:37 - Jun 29 by Herbivore

Nonsense disallowed goal for me as well. He's offside in the build up but not interfering with play at that stage, when the ball is played to him he's well onside. Game's gone.


Well and truly gone. Sick of ‘some’ incidents being reviewed to death but not others. Use tech for “did the ball cross the line” decisions and leave everything else to the on-field officials.

62 - 78 - 81
Poll: What sport is the most corrupt?

1
Arf! (n/t) on 21:40 - Jun 29 with 920 viewsSarge

Two horrendous decisions within 2 minutes of each other. Saw some discussion in the last round that the most contentious VAR decisions have been given by British officials. Might be something in that. Totally inept.
0
Arf! (n/t) on 21:42 - Jun 29 with 880 viewsRyorry

And a hahahaha after that miss …

Poll: Town's most cultured left foot ever?

0
Arf! (n/t) on 21:45 - Jun 29 with 848 viewsSarge

Arf! (n/t) on 21:40 - Jun 29 by Illinoisblue

Well and truly gone. Sick of ‘some’ incidents being reviewed to death but not others. Use tech for “did the ball cross the line” decisions and leave everything else to the on-field officials.


This.

There was nowhere near this level of controversy attached to every single game back when we let referees just do their job. Whatever impact this was supposed to have on stopping games being remembered solely for their officiating it’s had the complete opposite.

I’m disappointed in Ipswich that we’re now one of the clubs endorsing this farce.
0
Arf! (n/t) on 21:45 - Jun 29 with 849 viewsLankHenners

Arf! (n/t) on 21:37 - Jun 29 by Herbivore

Nonsense disallowed goal for me as well. He's offside in the build up but not interfering with play at that stage, when the ball is played to him he's well onside. Game's gone.




Like the penalty, technically right but stupid to be ruling goals out for someone being in a position where being a toenail offside gives them no advantage.

Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand.
Poll: What is Celina's problem?

0
Login to get fewer ads

Arf! (n/t) on 21:57 - Jun 29 with 781 viewsHerbivore

Arf! (n/t) on 21:45 - Jun 29 by LankHenners



Like the penalty, technically right but stupid to be ruling goals out for someone being in a position where being a toenail offside gives them no advantage.


They showed that image after I'd posted. His big toe is a millimetre offside on that image. As you say, technically correct but doesn't quite sit right.

Poll: Latest TWTD opinion poll - who are you voting for?
Blog: Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

0
Arf! (n/t) on 00:35 - Jun 30 with 638 viewsBugs

Arf! (n/t) on 21:45 - Jun 29 by LankHenners



Like the penalty, technically right but stupid to be ruling goals out for someone being in a position where being a toenail offside gives them no advantage.


Offside is offside, there is no subjectivity to the rule. Bring in a rule that someone can't be offside as they are just a little offside, and they aren't gaining an advantage would open the can of worms of subjectivity.

But with that said, if tight calls like these goals are ruled out, you want to be bloody sure the tech is making the right calls.

I'm not sure if this is still the case, but when Hawkeye was first used in tennis to adjudicate line calls, it had a margin of error of an inch or so. Pretty useless on tight calls.

If there is a margin of error that's within the tight calls in the tech, then on field decisions must stand IMO. But getting the companies installing the tech to admit there is a margin of error is another thing.
[Post edited 30 Jun 2024 0:36]
0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025