Forum | For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth by Illinoisblue

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth 13:29 - Jul 3 with 10729 views

	62 - 78 - 81
Poll:	What sport is the most corrupt?

For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 18:18 - Jul 3 with 1018 views

nodge_blue

For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 15:12 - Jul 3 by PhilTWTD
Indeed, very easy to get to 10 when you lay out the positions like that. I was thinking in terms of wanting more evolution than revolution which 10 or 11 signings feels more like. Definitely think we need people in all those positions, though.

Do we need a LB if Johnson can play there?

Also I would persuade Walton to stay and fight for the keepers jersey.

Poll:

best attacking central midfielder?

For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 18:24 - Jul 3 with 966 views

ITFCBlues

For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 18:18 - Jul 3 by nodge_blue
Do we need a LB if Johnson can play there? Also I would persuade Walton to stay and fight for the keepers jersey.

Yes. It's a specialised role with how we play.

Poll:

Has our squad been improved this summer?

For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 20:53 - Jul 3 with 680 views

Xatticus

For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 18:24 - Jul 3 by ITFCBlues
Yes. It's a specialised role with how we play.

Or the role has become specialized because of the personnel we have. I'm sure McKenna is making the most of what he has and that his tactics aren't rigid.

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread