| At least we're not out of it... 15:56 - Aug 24 with 874 views | tonybied |
...and probably should've been more in it considering we should've been awarded a penalty.
I thought VAR was going to mean we would get given penalties for obvious, missed fouls but alas, it seems the bigger teams still get given an unfair advantage. |  | | |  |
| At least we're not out of it... on 15:57 - Aug 24 with 833 views | _clive_baker_ |
The penalty was annoying. Personally I think both would be soft but they're either both given or neither are. If you have to watch 400 replays then I would suggest its not clear and / or obvious. |  | | |
| At least we're not out of it... on 15:59 - Aug 24 with 804 views | tonybied |
| At least we're not out of it... on 15:57 - Aug 24 by _clive_baker_ |
The penalty was annoying. Personally I think both would be soft but they're either both given or neither are. If you have to watch 400 replays then I would suggest its not clear and / or obvious. |
I'd wager they didn't look at ours more than twice! [Post edited 24 Aug 2024 15:59]
| | | |
| At least we're not out of it... on 16:00 - Aug 24 with 783 views | WicklowBlue |
Aside for the 5 mins of madness we've done OK, it was always going to super difficult.
Second half go again and try to cut out the mistakes. |  | | |
| At least we're not out of it... on 16:01 - Aug 24 with 758 views | Clutch |
| At least we're not out of it... on 16:00 - Aug 24 by WicklowBlue |
Aside for the 5 mins of madness we've done OK, it was always going to super difficult.
Second half go again and try to cut out the mistakes. |
I agree, not been awful. I think we need to bring Cajuste on though. |  | | |
| At least we're not out of it... on 16:02 - Aug 24 with 730 views | ArnoldMoorhen |
| At least we're not out of it... on 15:59 - Aug 24 by tonybied |
I'd wager they didn't look at ours more than twice! [Post edited 24 Aug 2024 15:59]
|
And probably didn't look at the angle which clearly shows the attempt to dead-leg Davis. |  | | |
| At least we're not out of it... on 16:04 - Aug 24 with 688 views | _clive_baker_ |
| At least we're not out of it... on 16:01 - Aug 24 by Clutch |
I agree, not been awful. I think we need to bring Cajuste on though. |
Would be nice to get 30 minutes into him. Longer term Luongo isn't going to be much of a feature this season IMO, so its a good opportunity to get Cajuste on. | | | |
| At least we're not out of it... on 16:05 - Aug 24 with 670 views | stonojnr |
Its the Prems implementation of VAR I think, thats why its annoying because you lose the consistency, Im sure if would have been given in any other league who use it | | | |
| At least we're not out of it... on 16:06 - Aug 24 with 655 views | TheBoyBlue |
We're not still in it, but apart from that crazy period with the goals we have done OK. Maybe we'll get one back, but I imagine City probably still have at least another goal or two in them today. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| At least we're not out of it... on 16:09 - Aug 24 with 623 views | _clive_baker_ |
| At least we're not out of it... on 16:05 - Aug 24 by stonojnr |
Its the Prems implementation of VAR I think, thats why its annoying because you lose the consistency, Im sure if would have been given in any other league who use it |
I've always said each team should get 1 challenge per half. You keep your challenge if its successful. VAR should be reactive rather than getting involved in everything it fancies but seemingly to different degrees. | | | |
| At least we're not out of it... on 16:11 - Aug 24 with 601 views | tonybied |
| At least we're not out of it... on 16:09 - Aug 24 by _clive_baker_ |
I've always said each team should get 1 challenge per half. You keep your challenge if its successful. VAR should be reactive rather than getting involved in everything it fancies but seemingly to different degrees. |
I don't think that would've changed anything as it was reviewed anyway. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
