Broadhead, Chaplin, Burns 20:04 - Oct 5 with 1752 views | itfcsuth | I know at a different, but we look a shadow of the danger that trip caused for so long. The cohesion and cutting edge they provide for near 2 years. Look a long way off that understanding and fluidity currently. Have to go back to Broadhead, Chaplin, Burns post international break and build from there imo. |  | | |  |
Broadhead, Chaplin, Burns on 20:07 - Oct 5 with 1687 views | Bluecasp | Very keen to see how Broadhead does at this level. Chaplin did well when he came on today and lovely ball to Smozdics which he should have scored from. Burns looked like he lacked belief first half but was better second half. Ultimately it may be a stretch too far for all 3 but it's still early days. |  | |  |
Broadhead, Chaplin, Burns on 20:09 - Oct 5 with 1656 views | ibbleobble | 😂 - that’s not going to happen. |  | |  |
Broadhead, Chaplin, Burns on 20:22 - Oct 5 with 1555 views | itfcsuth |
Broadhead, Chaplin, Burns on 20:07 - Oct 5 by Bluecasp | Very keen to see how Broadhead does at this level. Chaplin did well when he came on today and lovely ball to Smozdics which he should have scored from. Burns looked like he lacked belief first half but was better second half. Ultimately it may be a stretch too far for all 3 but it's still early days. |
Presume Broadhead will be back post international break fitness permitting. Chaplin provided a beautiful touch to Szmodics, but again only gets 10 minutes. Burns agreed, anonymous first half, much better second half, believed he could beat he man a little more. |  | |  |
Broadhead, Chaplin, Burns on 20:25 - Oct 5 with 1525 views | Nutkins_Return | Absolutely not. As much as I love Chaplin and always will he is not Prem. Broadhead technically can play this level and will I'm sure get a chance. |  |
|  |
Broadhead, Chaplin, Burns on 20:51 - Oct 5 with 1403 views | pointofblue | I think the biggest issue is Hutchinson at ten. There have been signs of it working - like against Villa, where he was popping up everywhere - but too often he goes missing and that means we lose an outlet in a key position. If McKenna wants a player of Burns or Ogbene's ilk on the right then, as tough as it is, I think Hutchinson should be benched for Szmodics. Firstly, Hutchinson can be used as cover for any position behind Hirst and, secondly, he has pace which can stretch tiring defences. I think Szmodics will have more of an impact centrally than he does from the left. |  |
|  |
Broadhead, Chaplin, Burns on 02:43 - Oct 6 with 1036 views | itfcsuth |
Broadhead, Chaplin, Burns on 20:09 - Oct 5 by ibbleobble | 😂 - that’s not going to happen. |
Why is it that? |  | |  |
Broadhead, Chaplin, Burns on 02:44 - Oct 6 with 1032 views | itfcsuth |
Broadhead, Chaplin, Burns on 20:25 - Oct 5 by Nutkins_Return | Absolutely not. As much as I love Chaplin and always will he is not Prem. Broadhead technically can play this level and will I'm sure get a chance. |
Nobody so far this season has even looked close to being a suited for that 10 role as Chaplin has over the past 2 years. |  | |  |
Broadhead, Chaplin, Burns on 02:49 - Oct 6 with 1026 views | itfcsuth |
Broadhead, Chaplin, Burns on 20:51 - Oct 5 by pointofblue | I think the biggest issue is Hutchinson at ten. There have been signs of it working - like against Villa, where he was popping up everywhere - but too often he goes missing and that means we lose an outlet in a key position. If McKenna wants a player of Burns or Ogbene's ilk on the right then, as tough as it is, I think Hutchinson should be benched for Szmodics. Firstly, Hutchinson can be used as cover for any position behind Hirst and, secondly, he has pace which can stretch tiring defences. I think Szmodics will have more of an impact centrally than he does from the left. |
Agree entirely on Hutch, not a 10. Always looks best a wide right payer for me, he’s a brilliant 1v1 dribbler, but not suited to the 10. Not sure he has the cuteness to play in the 10, and doesn’t have that relationship or understanding of the role like Chaplin. |  | |  |
| |