| No subject 00:16 - Mar 16 with 1012 views | mistert |
So many posts tonight, all giving us the benefit of their wonderful hindsight. For 7 minutes today we were miles off it but for the other 83 minutes we were equal to everything. Just accept the fact that we're close but not close enough.
We tried our best but it wasn't good enough and Philogene isn't half as bad as you think he his! |  | | |  |
| No subject on 00:24 - Mar 16 with 947 views | Illinoisblue |
“If you ignore the goals we conceded…” isn’t very convincing for your argument. |  |
| |
| No subject on 00:28 - Mar 16 with 926 views | waveneyblue |
| No subject on 00:24 - Mar 16 by Illinoisblue |
“If you ignore the goals we conceded…” isn’t very convincing for your argument. |
Pretty sure that's not what he was saying.
But don't let that stop you. |  | | |
| No subject on 00:41 - Mar 16 with 882 views | Illinoisblue |
| No subject on 00:28 - Mar 16 by waveneyblue |
Pretty sure that's not what he was saying.
But don't let that stop you. |
Apologies, waveney, I’ll check with you first before posting. | |
| |
| No subject on 00:47 - Mar 16 with 867 views | Garv |
But seven minutes was all they needed to win the game.
If they'd needed 17 minutes or 27 minutes to win the game, I dare say they would have used it, because they are and were a better team than us. Better quality, more physical, quicker, slicker, everything really. Like most sides. |  |
| |
| No subject on 19:58 - Apr 5 with 427 views | mistert |
| No subject on 00:24 - Mar 16 by Illinoisblue |
“If you ignore the goals we conceded…” isn’t very convincing for your argument. |
Putting something I didn't say in quotes also isn't very convincing. | | | |
| No subject on 20:01 - Apr 5 with 395 views | pointofblue |
For seven minutes? We were off it for the entire second half. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
