Forum | So there it is then Rachel from accounts by onceablue

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

So there it is then Rachel from accounts 14:11 - Mar 26 with 3075 views

onceablue

Has stated we won’t see any real benefit until 2029

How convenient🤔😂

-5

So there it is then Rachel from accounts on 19:38 - Mar 26 with 743 views

redrickstuhaart

So there it is then Rachel from accounts on 19:32 - Mar 26 by portmanking
The pièce de résistance is that Reeves and Labour are proudly stating we're going to be £500 better off.... in 2029! But even this has been proven to be a downgrade by the OBR, which Reeves conveniently avoided mentioning at the despatch box. In fact, Labour's policies are set to lower real household disposable income by 0.25% over the rest of their parliamentary term. Yikes.

Actually real household income has been upgraded in the forecasts. Unless R4 were lying this evening.

So there it is then Rachel from accounts on 19:45 - Mar 26 with 698 views

portmanking

So there it is then Rachel from accounts on 19:38 - Mar 26 by redrickstuhaart
Actually real household income has been upgraded in the forecasts. Unless R4 were lying this evening.

It's there in black and white, so R4 is lying or hasn't fully read the dossier:

So there it is then Rachel from accounts on 19:48 - Mar 26 with 688 views

redrickstuhaart

So there it is then Rachel from accounts on 19:45 - Mar 26 by portmanking
It's there in black and white, so R4 is lying or hasn't fully read the dossier:

Err still growing though. By more than previously.

So there it is then Rachel from accounts on 20:13 - Mar 26 with 646 views

NeedhamChris

So there it is then Rachel from accounts on 19:48 - Mar 26 by redrickstuhaart
Err still growing though. By more than previously.

Changing the question to suit your answer isn't a great look

	Winner of the "most obvious troll ever seen on here" award, sponsored by _Clive_Baker
Poll:	If McKenna had gone to Brighton - do you think we'd have had...

-1

So there it is then Rachel from accounts on 22:47 - Mar 26 with 567 views

Swansea_Blue

So there it is then Rachel from accounts on 19:21 - Mar 26 by vapour_trail
Steve M, over many many years, has been one of the most level headed posters on this site. I do not count myself amongst that cohort. You and the OP are a pair of fcking divs.

I’m here for this. Steve_M is the antithesis of some of these cheap shot, wind up merchants. Consistently one of the posters that holds this place together with some sanity and decency.

Poll:

Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

So there it is then Rachel from accounts on 22:50 - Mar 26 with 563 views

Swansea_Blue

So there it is then Rachel from accounts on 20:13 - Mar 26 by NeedhamChris
Changing the question to suit your answer isn't a great look

It’s not been changed at all. Redrick… said ‘Actually real household income has been upgraded in the forecasts’. Which is demonstrably true https://inews.co.uk/inews-lifestyle/money/saving-and-banking/winners-losers-hous

Now, the growth is crap, but that’s another story. But “the look” was fine and accurate.

Poll:

Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

So there it is then Rachel from accounts on 07:46 - Mar 27 with 424 views

portmanking

So there it is then Rachel from accounts on 19:48 - Mar 26 by redrickstuhaart
Err still growing though. By more than previously.

Growing 0.5% a year.... yippee. That's an inflation-busting increase. Oh, wait.

So there it is then Rachel from accounts on 07:47 - Mar 27 with 422 views

redrickstuhaart

So there it is then Rachel from accounts on 07:46 - Mar 27 by portmanking
Growing 0.5% a year.... yippee. That's an inflation-busting increase. Oh, wait.

The calculation includes inflation.

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread