Forum | Can't see Latte Lath myself by cbower

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Can't see Latte Lath myself 17:33 - Jun 1 with 921 views

Just don't see us paying anywhere near the money supposedly payed by Atlanta. I know McKenna seems to return to targets but this one is so much money and we're a Championship club right now. The Chelsea and Man City youngsters are a maybe but I'd prefer a loan with a buy clause upon promotion. Interesting to me is how many strikers we buy. Assuming Hirst stays, what happens to Al Hamadi? Is Szmodics considered a forward or is he part of a three behind the striker? Interesting times and tye next two months will be long.

bluescouser

Can't see Latte Lath myself on 17:42 - Jun 1 with 835 views

Keno

Probably cos he’s in the US, you’d need a hell of a telescope to see him over there

Poll:	At which of our last 10 games will be confirm EPL survival?
Blog:	[Blog] My World Cup Reflections

Can't see Latte Lath myself on 18:05 - Jun 1 with 721 views

Kieran_Knows

Loan with option/obligation should we get promotors could well be on the cards though?

Poll:

We’ve got super KM, he knows exactly what we need. Woolfie at the back…

Can't see Latte Lath myself on 18:19 - Jun 1 with 649 views

Swansea_Blue

Not IF we’re going to spend big on this guy from Chelsea. We know Hirst is good at this level, so we don’t need 3 expensive first team number 9s.

And no, A Hamadi doesn’t stay (he’s miles off, and I suspect he will be leaving as soon as we can offload him) and Szmodics isn’t a striker.

[Post edited 1 Jun 18:30]

Poll:

Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread