| Offside law change on 10:06 - Jun 13 with 1117 views | Rimsy |
Marvellous. More confusion for the ref and var |  |
|  |
| Offside law change on 12:50 - Jun 13 with 962 views | Freddies_Ears |
| Offside law change on 10:06 - Jun 13 by Rimsy |
Marvellous. More confusion for the ref and var |
Oh! I always thought that the offside was judge at the point the ball leaves the passing foot, rather than the point the passing foot first makes contact with the ball. |  | | |
| Offside law change on 15:04 - Jun 13 with 787 views | mellowblue |
| Offside law change on 12:50 - Jun 13 by Freddies_Ears |
Oh! I always thought that the offside was judge at the point the ball leaves the passing foot, rather than the point the passing foot first makes contact with the ball. |
Same here. | | | |
| Offside law change on 15:12 - Jun 13 with 767 views | tonybied |
| Offside law change on 12:50 - Jun 13 by Freddies_Ears |
Oh! I always thought that the offside was judge at the point the ball leaves the passing foot, rather than the point the passing foot first makes contact with the ball. |
It's moot anyway, the only way you'd be able to tell when the ball first makes contact or when it leaves the foot is with a specialist camera that has a ridiculously high frame rate. That's why offside should be left to the on-field decision unless it's clear daylight decision that's been missed. |  | | |
| Offside law change on 18:52 - Jun 13 with 602 views | Freddies_Ears |
| Offside law change on 15:12 - Jun 13 by tonybied |
It's moot anyway, the only way you'd be able to tell when the ball first makes contact or when it leaves the foot is with a specialist camera that has a ridiculously high frame rate. That's why offside should be left to the on-field decision unless it's clear daylight decision that's been missed. |
Totally agree. The offside line is measured to the millimetre, it seems (centimetre, at least), but they cannot measure to within, say, 0.05 seconds when the pass was made. A sprinting player can cover almost 10m/ second = 1m / 0.1 secs = 50cm within the margin of error of the delivery of the ball. So, offside by less than 2 feet (in old money) is unreliable. | | | |
| Offside law change on 19:03 - Jun 13 with 577 views | mellowblue |
that is a good wangle. So if you maintain contact with the ball, your striker makes the run, still keeping contact you then prod it through past the defenders, the striker would not be offside as far as VAR is concerned. Sounds mad. | | | |
| Offside law change on 19:09 - Jun 13 with 562 views | SheffordBlue |
| Offside law change on 15:12 - Jun 13 by tonybied |
It's moot anyway, the only way you'd be able to tell when the ball first makes contact or when it leaves the foot is with a specialist camera that has a ridiculously high frame rate. That's why offside should be left to the on-field decision unless it's clear daylight decision that's been missed. |
I think the semi-automated offside has a sensor in the ball. It's probably easier for the system to identify when contact has initially been made as the sensor will pick this up. That might account for the change to rule. | |
| |
| Offside law change on 20:26 - Jun 13 with 439 views | tonybied |
| Offside law change on 19:09 - Jun 13 by SheffordBlue |
I think the semi-automated offside has a sensor in the ball. It's probably easier for the system to identify when contact has initially been made as the sensor will pick this up. That might account for the change to rule. |
That makes sense, I guess! Id forgotten about the ball sensors to be honest! It would also depend on the footage being perfectly aligned with the ball sensor though. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Offside law change on 20:53 - Jun 13 with 383 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Offside law change on 19:03 - Jun 13 by mellowblue |
that is a good wangle. So if you maintain contact with the ball, your striker makes the run, still keeping contact you then prod it through past the defenders, the striker would not be offside as far as VAR is concerned. Sounds mad. |
Yep. Sounds nuts and I wonder what the ref/var would do in that scenario. The rule change is very odd too. Thorn point out the scoop pass loophole, Ifab acknowledge this… and then change a rule relating just to the keepers. Er, ok. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
