| Surprised we're not in for Jack Rudoni 13:49 - Aug 10 with 1678 views | Warkystache |
Apparently, Southampton tabled a bid of £7 million, which was rejected, but he's available for £9 million according to Birmingham papers.
Another good one - ex-Coventry midfielder Callum O'Hare is available from the Scum of the North (sorry, still remember 1997). Two quite viable players who might be good enough? |  |
| |  |
| Surprised we're not in for Jack Rudoni on 13:52 - Aug 10 with 1622 views | southnorfolkblue |
No way Rudonis available for 9 million…. |  |
| |
| Surprised we're not in for Jack Rudoni on 14:05 - Aug 10 with 1447 views | Superblue95 |
McKenna probably remembers the ‘performance’ he put in against us for Huddersfield on the day we were promoted.
Doubt we’d want someone so quick and happy to down tools. |  |
| |
| Surprised we're not in for Jack Rudoni on 14:16 - Aug 10 with 1322 views | cressi |
Said we should have bought him at Huddersfield after he went the from Wimbledon the secret is to get them at that point not one it costs 15 million. | | | |
| Surprised we're not in for Jack Rudoni on 15:05 - Aug 10 with 1013 views | Big_Jase |
O’Hare is nowhere near good enough for what we need.
Rudoni is a decent player, not quite sure where he would fit in here, but a decent player. |  |
| |
| Surprised we're not in for Jack Rudoni on 15:13 - Aug 10 with 961 views | MillsTash |
| Surprised we're not in for Jack Rudoni on 14:05 - Aug 10 by Superblue95 |
McKenna probably remembers the ‘performance’ he put in against us for Huddersfield on the day we were promoted.
Doubt we’d want someone so quick and happy to down tools. |
Spot on.
I remember him simply from that game. Looked way off it and nothing special. |  | | |
| Surprised we're not in for Jack Rudoni on 16:26 - Aug 10 with 654 views | LeoMuff |
Good player but striker and CM are the priority |  |
| |
| Surprised we're not in for Jack Rudoni on 17:33 - Aug 10 with 450 views | Nutkins_Return |
| Surprised we're not in for Jack Rudoni on 13:52 - Aug 10 by southnorfolkblue |
No way Rudonis available for 9 million…. |
Wouldn't touch him. Just my opinion but seen a lot of him living that way and I know he is decent but he doesn't have the mobility. He's got goal in him and technically decent but he isn't suitable for a high press and I don't think he would work for us.
This is my view and I'm not saying he isn't good. I just think he has some big limitations and is more a good champ player. | |
| |
| Surprised we're not in for Jack Rudoni on 19:52 - Aug 10 with 186 views | southnorfolkblue |
| Surprised we're not in for Jack Rudoni on 17:33 - Aug 10 by Nutkins_Return |
Wouldn't touch him. Just my opinion but seen a lot of him living that way and I know he is decent but he doesn't have the mobility. He's got goal in him and technically decent but he isn't suitable for a high press and I don't think he would work for us.
This is my view and I'm not saying he isn't good. I just think he has some big limitations and is more a good champ player. |
I don’t have strong opinions about him either way, but my comment was really aimed at the alleged price that the press were putting on him. The Cov fans I know say he’s their best player so the figure being quoted seems significantly on the low side | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Surprised we're not in for Jack Rudoni on 19:58 - Aug 10 with 125 views | bournemouthblue |
| Surprised we're not in for Jack Rudoni on 17:33 - Aug 10 by Nutkins_Return |
Wouldn't touch him. Just my opinion but seen a lot of him living that way and I know he is decent but he doesn't have the mobility. He's got goal in him and technically decent but he isn't suitable for a high press and I don't think he would work for us.
This is my view and I'm not saying he isn't good. I just think he has some big limitations and is more a good champ player. |
Reminds me a bit of Paul Anderson |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
