Forum | Why are penalties always ‘dodgy’ ? (n/t) by Benters

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Why are penalties always ‘dodgy’ ? (n/t) 16:16 - Aug 23 with 391 views

	Gentlybentley
Poll:	Simple poll plane banner over Norwich

Why are penalties always ‘dodgy’ ? (n/t) on 16:21 - Aug 23 with 345 views

Radlett_blue

If they're not, they're "stonewall".

Poll:

Should horse racing be banned in the UK?

Why are penalties always ‘dodgy’ ? (n/t) on 16:25 - Aug 23 with 308 views

noggin

Only the ones given against us.

Poll:

If KM goes now, will you applaud him when he returns with his new club?

Why are penalties always ‘dodgy’ ? (n/t) on 16:57 - Aug 23 with 217 views

Plums

Because most fans and pundits don't even know what IFAB is, let alone understand what's in the Laws of the Game.

	It's 106 miles to Portman Road, we've got a full tank of gas, half a round of Port Salut, it's dark... and we're wearing blue tinted sunglasses.
Poll:	Which recent triallist should we have signed?

Why are penalties always ‘dodgy’ ? (n/t) on 17:16 - Aug 23 with 155 views

BeachBlue

Yeah I mean we only had like 80+ minutes to score two goals and make it irrelevant.

Fine margins. (GRRRR!!!)

Why are penalties always ‘dodgy’ ? (n/t) on 17:27 - Aug 23 with 117 views

ArnoldMoorhen

That one wasn't.

The only way it wasn't a penalty was if Greaves was fouled. Which would have been a soft free kick.

Once on the floor he puts his legs through the legs of the attacker, and there's contact.

Given at least nine times out of ten.

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread