| Hypothetical “manager change” question….. 10:48 - Oct 22 with 2929 views | Bloots |
….to gauge opinion, not demanding change.
We are 10 games in and 5 points off the play offs.
If, come December, we are 20 games in and 10 points off the play offs, do we have to consider a change at the top?
If not when do we?
Or do we just think it will come good at some stage again? |  |
| "Yeah I think you’re right, yet again….” - TWTD User (Oct 2025) |
| |  |
| Hypothetical “manager change” question….. on 18:16 - Oct 22 with 218 views | muccletonjoe |
| Hypothetical “manager change” question….. on 12:39 - Oct 22 by The_Flashing_Smile |
You seem to be a lot more vocal on here after a defeat than a win. You barely posted anything after we beat Norwich, for example. |
I have barely posted anything about the defeat to Charlton |  | | |
| Hypothetical “manager change” question….. on 18:20 - Oct 22 with 200 views | phillymark |
He gets the whole season in my opinion |  | | |
| Hypothetical “manager change” question….. on 19:41 - Oct 22 with 150 views | Kieran_Knows |
| Hypothetical “manager change” question….. on 13:30 - Oct 22 by SitfcB |
Some people said promotion wasn’t happening a month or so before the end of the League 1 season….
A long, long way to go.
Not worried yet. |
The problem we have this season is that a proportion of the fan base have already made their mind up on this squad/certain players - in some cases before a ball was even kicked. Because it’s not Woolfie, or Burgess, or Broadhead, or Chaplin starting, it just gives people ammunition to go after their replacements and it ends up being a p!ssing contest as to who was ‘right’ first.
McKenna told us from the get go that it was going to take us time to get up to speed with a new group, and lo and behold, he’s right.
Give him a new contract, and then give him another one after that. |  |
| |
| Hypothetical “manager change” question….. on 19:47 - Oct 22 with 137 views | Whos_blue |
| Hypothetical “manager change” question….. on 19:41 - Oct 22 by Kieran_Knows |
The problem we have this season is that a proportion of the fan base have already made their mind up on this squad/certain players - in some cases before a ball was even kicked. Because it’s not Woolfie, or Burgess, or Broadhead, or Chaplin starting, it just gives people ammunition to go after their replacements and it ends up being a p!ssing contest as to who was ‘right’ first.
McKenna told us from the get go that it was going to take us time to get up to speed with a new group, and lo and behold, he’s right.
Give him a new contract, and then give him another one after that. |
Your first paragraph is sad but oh so true.
Quite depressing really. |  |
| Distortion becomes somehow pure in its wildness. |
| |
| Hypothetical “manager change” question….. on 20:38 - Oct 22 with 102 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Hypothetical “manager change” question….. on 18:16 - Oct 22 by muccletonjoe |
I have barely posted anything about the defeat to Charlton |
Well that's not true, and in any case I didn't mention Charlton. |  |
| |
| Hypothetical “manager change” question….. on 04:21 - Oct 23 with 41 views | muccletonjoe |
| Hypothetical “manager change” question….. on 20:38 - Oct 22 by The_Flashing_Smile |
Well that's not true, and in any case I didn't mention Charlton. |
I mentioned it once but I think i got away with it | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
