| Give this a go.4-4-2 04:02 - Oct 25 with 632 views | eddiespearitt03 |
Baggott in central defence ?
( if ya think thats controversial, put Jack Taylor next to Baggott(
Humphreys at left back.
Davis at left midfield.
Philogene on right flank.
Clarke up front next to Hirst.
Shoot...Goal.
|  | | |  |
| Give this a go.4-4-2 on 06:30 - Oct 25 with 512 views | tcblue |
Put Walton up top as target man | | | |
| Give this a go.4-4-2 on 06:32 - Oct 25 with 511 views | tcblue |
| Give this a go.4-4-2 on 06:30 - Oct 25 by tcblue |
Put Walton up top as target man |
You're probably thinking "buh? But who will play in goal?"
I'm one step ahead of you. Szmodics will wear the gloves in our new 4-4-2 plans | | | |
| Give this a go.4-4-2 on 06:41 - Oct 25 with 492 views | Blue_Heath |
Well KM certainly needs to re-boot his tactics/formation but we all know it won't happen. | | | |
| Give this a go.4-4-2 on 08:43 - Oct 25 with 347 views | WeWereZombies |
Baggott and Humphreys played for the under twenty ones yesterday, I would be surprised if either made the bench this lunchtime. And Harry Clarke being rushed back to play up top ? Personally I would field another five players in addition to your named six as well the named six.
[edit: Sorry, forgot the obligatory 'but apart from that it looks fine.] [Post edited 25 Oct 9:11]
|  |
| |
| Give this a go.4-3-3 (n/t) on 10:29 - Oct 25 with 168 views | Scuzzer |
|  |
| |
| Give this a go.4-4-2 on 11:00 - Oct 25 with 116 views | itfcsuth |
I never won’t to be over critical of peoples opinions, it’s a game of different views.
But wow, this looks like a lottery selection.
I can definitely say this one won’t be given a go anytime soon. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
