| we're below norwich in the table 11:18 - Nov 26 with 1330 views | positivity | the table showing the half-time scores. https://footystats.org/england let's remember that before the next half-time meltdown, it's the score at 90+x minutes that matters! |  |
| |  |
| we're below norwich in the table on 11:24 - Nov 26 with 1285 views | MrPotatoHead | They'll be along in a minute to remind us of their 17 games of dominance in the half time tables. YOU'LL NEVER SING THAAAAAT |  | |  |
| we're below norwich in the table on 11:25 - Nov 26 with 1274 views | positivity |
| we're below norwich in the table on 11:24 - Nov 26 by MrPotatoHead | They'll be along in a minute to remind us of their 17 games of dominance in the half time tables. YOU'LL NEVER SING THAAAAAT |
their engraver is adding the final touches before adding it to their "trophy" cabinet |  |
|  |
| we're below norwich in the table on 11:32 - Nov 26 with 1230 views | J2BLUE | If ever there was a sign for the fans to show a bit more patience this is it. |  | |  |
| we're below norwich in the table on 16:05 - Nov 26 with 960 views | mellowblue | we must be doing pretty well in the second half table (if there is such a thing) |  | |  |
| we're below norwich in the table on 17:11 - Nov 26 with 841 views | Axeldalai_lama |
| we're below norwich in the table on 16:05 - Nov 26 by mellowblue | we must be doing pretty well in the second half table (if there is such a thing) |
https://footystats.org/england 6th. Norwich bottom!! |  | |  |
| we're below norwich in the table on 17:34 - Nov 26 with 771 views | RadioOrwell | Anyone see Look East ? Interviews with distraught nodge fans and game post mortem. Oh Ipswich won. Next up a visit to .... |  | |  |
| we're below norwich in the table on 18:02 - Nov 26 with 691 views | positivity |
it explains it on the page "Expected Points Table for England - Championship 2025/26 season. xWins = Expected Wins, xDraws = Expected Draws, xLosses = Expected Losses. The expected results are based on the xG of each match. xG of each match is rounded to the nearest round number and treated as the result. For example, if Southampton FC's xG was 0.95 and Ipswich Town FC's xG was 1.17, then the result will be rounded to 1-1, and therefore, treated as a draw. If the xG were 0.95 vs 1.55, then it would be rounded to 1-2, and therefore a win for Ipswich Town FC.Based on the Expected Points, the 1st place on the table would be Southampton FC with 34 expected points." tldr:- it's a table based on your xG in individual games, against which soton and us are underachieving and coventry are overachieving |  |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
| we're below norwich in the table on 18:33 - Nov 26 with 655 views | You_Bloo_Right |
| we're below norwich in the table on 18:02 - Nov 26 by positivity | it explains it on the page "Expected Points Table for England - Championship 2025/26 season. xWins = Expected Wins, xDraws = Expected Draws, xLosses = Expected Losses. The expected results are based on the xG of each match. xG of each match is rounded to the nearest round number and treated as the result. For example, if Southampton FC's xG was 0.95 and Ipswich Town FC's xG was 1.17, then the result will be rounded to 1-1, and therefore, treated as a draw. If the xG were 0.95 vs 1.55, then it would be rounded to 1-2, and therefore a win for Ipswich Town FC.Based on the Expected Points, the 1st place on the table would be Southampton FC with 34 expected points." tldr:- it's a table based on your xG in individual games, against which soton and us are underachieving and coventry are overachieving |
If Leicester finish 4th at the end of the season I may have to revise my opinion of xG as a useful stat. |  |
|  |
| we're below norwich in the table on 20:47 - Nov 26 with 506 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| we're below norwich in the table on 11:24 - Nov 26 by MrPotatoHead | They'll be along in a minute to remind us of their 17 games of dominance in the half time tables. YOU'LL NEVER SING THAAAAAT |
17 games of 45 minutes dominance! They messed up their 100% home record last night, though. |  |
|  |
| |