| A bit naive from the BBC's Royal Correspondent 16:54 - Feb 19 with 419 views | Zx1988 |
"They [The Royals] will have to answer questions about Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and be held accountable, something which, up until now, has been an alien concept for them."
No they won't.
They can keep schtum, hide behind the fact that the whole matter is sub-judice, and wait for the furore to die down.
Never complain, never explain, and NEVER be held accountable. |  |
| |  |
| A bit naive from the BBC's Royal Correspondent on 17:16 - Feb 19 with 334 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
Earlier he was in front of Buckingham Palace excitedly mentioning how so far there was no sign of any police searches taking place there.
Perhaps because Andrew didn’t actually live there? [Post edited 19 Feb 17:21]
|  |
| |
| A bit naive from the BBC's Royal Correspondent on 19:12 - Feb 19 with 189 views | Oldsmoker |
You're right.
Andrew's not a fully paid-up member of the Royal Family anymore.
Any contact with the Royal Family will be done with the utmost deference.
Plod will not be forcing an entry at Buck Palace at 6 in the morning. |  |
| |
| A bit naive from the BBC's Royal Correspondent on 21:35 - Feb 19 with 112 views | ArnoldMoorhen |
| A bit naive from the BBC's Royal Correspondent on 19:12 - Feb 19 by Oldsmoker |
You're right.
Andrew's not a fully paid-up member of the Royal Family anymore.
Any contact with the Royal Family will be done with the utmost deference.
Plod will not be forcing an entry at Buck Palace at 6 in the morning. |
It would be interesting to see a TSG v Household Cavalry stand off, though, wouldn't it? | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
