| So either the FA have footage which has been denied to the rest of us 12:45 - Mar 23 with 1120 views | redrickstuhaart |
or they are lying?
Once again, how do they square this with the Cunha incident? |  |
| |  |
| So either the FA have footage which has been denied to the rest of us on 12:51 - Mar 23 with 1070 views | Illinoisblue |
Also, how can a ref go running to the FA and say, “hey me and my assistants missed what we think is a clear case of violent conduct” and not face any action for missing it in game? |  |
| |
| So either the FA have footage which has been denied to the rest of us on 12:51 - Mar 23 with 1054 views | redrickstuhaart |
| So either the FA have footage which has been denied to the rest of us on 12:51 - Mar 23 by Illinoisblue |
Also, how can a ref go running to the FA and say, “hey me and my assistants missed what we think is a clear case of violent conduct” and not face any action for missing it in game? |
How did they even know to look at it?
Seems vindictive to me. | |
| |
| So either the FA have footage which has been denied to the rest of us on 12:57 - Mar 23 with 1004 views | Reuser_is_God |
| So either the FA have footage which has been denied to the rest of us on 12:51 - Mar 23 by Illinoisblue |
Also, how can a ref go running to the FA and say, “hey me and my assistants missed what we think is a clear case of violent conduct” and not face any action for missing it in game? |
Or why haven’t they gone running to the FA & said “we missed a blatant penalty” too.
Clearly just him being a little b1tch. |  |
| |
| So either the FA have footage which has been denied to the rest of us on 12:59 - Mar 23 with 973 views | Illinoisblue |
| So either the FA have footage which has been denied to the rest of us on 12:51 - Mar 23 by redrickstuhaart |
How did they even know to look at it?
Seems vindictive to me. |
Clearly vindictive. The FA report says the “hair pull” was so violent it made the Leicester player’s head jolt back. Something so clear and obvious… yet bubsy and his assistants all missed it? Clearly not fit to referee if they miss something so blatant. | |
| |
| So either the FA have footage which has been denied to the rest of us on 13:00 - Mar 23 with 958 views | redrickstuhaart |
| So either the FA have footage which has been denied to the rest of us on 12:59 - Mar 23 by Illinoisblue |
Clearly vindictive. The FA report says the “hair pull” was so violent it made the Leicester player’s head jolt back. Something so clear and obvious… yet bubsy and his assistants all missed it? Clearly not fit to referee if they miss something so blatant. |
More to the point, there is literally no footage which has been seen publically which shows ANY of this.
We are entitled to know, surely, if there is some devastating conclusive footage as they appear to describe, or whether they are in fact lying. | |
| |
| So either the FA have footage which has been denied to the rest of us on 13:02 - Mar 23 with 941 views | Swansea_Blue |
| So either the FA have footage which has been denied to the rest of us on 13:00 - Mar 23 by redrickstuhaart |
More to the point, there is literally no footage which has been seen publically which shows ANY of this.
We are entitled to know, surely, if there is some devastating conclusive footage as they appear to describe, or whether they are in fact lying. |
Quite. Yet apparently the whole panel saw it clearly on the footage. What footage were they looking at and why haven’t we been able to see it? It’s all very odd. |  |
| |
| So either the FA have footage which has been denied to the rest of us on 13:12 - Mar 23 with 846 views | redrickstuhaart |
| So either the FA have footage which has been denied to the rest of us on 13:02 - Mar 23 by Swansea_Blue |
Quite. Yet apparently the whole panel saw it clearly on the footage. What footage were they looking at and why haven’t we been able to see it? It’s all very odd. |
It looks corrupt. And not for the first time in recent seasons.
I dont mean that in the sense of brown envelopes (though we must not simpyl rule that out as something that could never happen in the English game, given the amounts of money sloshing about). Rather in the sense of referees and FA backing each other up and convincing themselves of something in the face of all the evidence. It shows a very troubling absence of real integrity, independence and disciplined thinking. [Post edited 23 Mar 13:15]
| |
| |
| So either the FA have footage which has been denied to the rest of us on 13:25 - Mar 23 with 737 views | Ftnfwest |
| So either the FA have footage which has been denied to the rest of us on 12:51 - Mar 23 by Illinoisblue |
Also, how can a ref go running to the FA and say, “hey me and my assistants missed what we think is a clear case of violent conduct” and not face any action for missing it in game? |
I think there would have been, lets say 'ramifications', if they'd gone against the Leicester players version of events here, but they've chosen to over egg what happened to such a degree that it's made them look ridiculous. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| So either the FA have footage which has been denied to the rest of us on 13:27 - Mar 23 with 706 views | Herbivore |
| So either the FA have footage which has been denied to the rest of us on 12:51 - Mar 23 by redrickstuhaart |
How did they even know to look at it?
Seems vindictive to me. |
How did he manage to see it on the replay? It's not close to being obvious from the main camera angle and his eyesight is so bad he couldn't see Kipre clearly being fouled despite looking right at it from a few yards away. Jesus must have paid him a visit on the Sunday to sort his eyes out. |  |
| |
| So either the FA have footage which has been denied to the rest of us on 13:58 - Mar 23 with 589 views | EastTownBlue |
| So either the FA have footage which has been denied to the rest of us on 12:51 - Mar 23 by redrickstuhaart |
How did they even know to look at it?
Seems vindictive to me. |
I didn't see the original incident at time although Okoli clearly suggested that his hair was pulled. Whether the ref should go back to look at that again with less than conclusive footage is another matter. | | | |
| So either the FA have footage which has been denied to the rest of us on 13:59 - Mar 23 with 583 views | Blue_Uprising |
| So either the FA have footage which has been denied to the rest of us on 13:12 - Mar 23 by redrickstuhaart |
It looks corrupt. And not for the first time in recent seasons.
I dont mean that in the sense of brown envelopes (though we must not simpyl rule that out as something that could never happen in the English game, given the amounts of money sloshing about). Rather in the sense of referees and FA backing each other up and convincing themselves of something in the face of all the evidence. It shows a very troubling absence of real integrity, independence and disciplined thinking. [Post edited 23 Mar 13:15]
|
Oh absolutely- they are very much in the ‘one bad apple’ gang. Close ranks and shut down any due process.
Unfortunate that these issues are too small to challenge and (I assume) there is not some kind of ‘small claims court’ version of the court of arbitration for sport. I feel that ultimately the inconsistency in process and decision making needs to be regularly shown up by a third party for any institutional change to take place.
Institutions that a corrupt in these ways, are also unfortunately ripe for the other types corruption such as financial. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
