By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
I really really hope I am wrong, but to me we are aiming for mediocraty. Aim for the top was always encouraged when I was a youngen. I think our recruitment may suffer. I cannot think of a worserer manager in the premier league.
No, we must stabilise our position in the PL first. I think the new nanager msy have the experience and attributes to achieve this.... small steps. Last thing we want is to be a yo-yo club.
No, we must stabilise our position in the PL first. I think the new nanager msy have the experience and attributes to achieve this.... small steps. Last thing we want is to be a yo-yo club.
I fear that's exactly what we're becoming. Appointing his mate from Bristol City days puts the lie to the notion that Ashton has explored 'all markets' and reflects Ashton's own lack of experience at the highest level.
Free to him. But where do you think AI sourced O’Neils likeness from? So Fab gets a ‘free’ image, and the photographer who took that original image, doesn’t get paid appropriately for the use.
It’s theft.
Which is why I used quote marks, and referenced the example of Getty Images.
But rights theft to save copyright fees isn't the end game of AI image construction.
The real questions to ask are:
Who owns the databases of billions of photos and videos?
What do they gain by slopping fake photos about and overwhelming the real?
What do they gain by creating a basic level of mistrust in the authenticity of all photos?
What do they gain by making the job of photo-journalists unsustainable financially?
Once people (individuals and businesses) are dependent on AI, how long will it take them to turn the screws in monetising it?