| So reducing heavy polluting vehicles improves health? 09:48 - Aug 19 with 815 views | Dubtractor | What a surprise...... Air pollution stunts children’s lung growth. New Queen Mary research found that improvements in air quality after the introduction of London’s ULEZ are associated with accelerated lung growth in children.
Read more: shorturl.at/Jx86o — Queen Mary University of London (@qmul.bsky.social) 2026-08-19T07:11:50.419Z |  |
| |  |
| So reducing heavy polluting vehicles improves health? on 09:51 - Aug 19 with 798 views | Swansea_Blue | Children being able to breath is so woke |  |
|  |
| So reducing heavy polluting vehicles improves health? on 10:21 - Aug 19 with 714 views | StokieBlue | Plenty of studies on this now showing the benefits of the ULEZ. The heavy pushback against it on here from people who don't even live in London was quite puzzling. SB |  |
| Avatar - M101 - Pinwheel Galaxy |
|  |
| So reducing heavy polluting vehicles improves health? on 10:23 - Aug 19 with 698 views | BloomBlue | So does that prove that petrol and diesel is ok? |  | |  |
| So reducing heavy polluting vehicles improves health? on 10:43 - Aug 19 with 642 views | balcombeblue |
| So reducing heavy polluting vehicles improves health? on 10:21 - Aug 19 by StokieBlue | Plenty of studies on this now showing the benefits of the ULEZ. The heavy pushback against it on here from people who don't even live in London was quite puzzling. SB |
I quite like many of the other measures on traffic which impact my regular commute walking between London Bridge and Bishopsgate. Wider footpaths, re-routed private cars, fewer heavy impact vehicles, electric buses. I think the concerns in outer London boroughs regarding transport infrastructure and the cost to those whose businesses were impacted was legitimate though. So too was the anticipated impact on low earners in particular. Many studies have highlighted this significant strain. A Financial Services commuter benefits far more than a care worker in outer London driving a non-compliant car. |  | |  |
| So reducing heavy polluting vehicles improves health? on 11:01 - Aug 19 with 591 views | Guthrum |
| So reducing heavy polluting vehicles improves health? on 10:43 - Aug 19 by balcombeblue | I quite like many of the other measures on traffic which impact my regular commute walking between London Bridge and Bishopsgate. Wider footpaths, re-routed private cars, fewer heavy impact vehicles, electric buses. I think the concerns in outer London boroughs regarding transport infrastructure and the cost to those whose businesses were impacted was legitimate though. So too was the anticipated impact on low earners in particular. Many studies have highlighted this significant strain. A Financial Services commuter benefits far more than a care worker in outer London driving a non-compliant car. |
Tho how many care workers are driving non-ULEZ-compliant cars? Most small petrol runarounds will be exempt (due to engine size). Even my 16-year-old 1.6L petrol people carrier is. |  |
|  |
| So reducing heavy polluting vehicles improves health? on 11:09 - Aug 19 with 566 views | balcombeblue |
| So reducing heavy polluting vehicles improves health? on 11:01 - Aug 19 by Guthrum | Tho how many care workers are driving non-ULEZ-compliant cars? Most small petrol runarounds will be exempt (due to engine size). Even my 16-year-old 1.6L petrol people carrier is. |
There was certainly lots of concern from groups representing lower paid workers and un-paid carers. I am pointing out that concerns were legitimate given the change and they came from a mix of groups. |  | |  |
| So reducing heavy polluting vehicles improves health? on 12:04 - Aug 19 with 487 views | bsw72 |
| So reducing heavy polluting vehicles improves health? on 09:51 - Aug 19 by Swansea_Blue | Children being able to breath is so woke |
Does no-one think about the negative impact on the asthma industry? Broken Britain. |  | |  |
| So reducing heavy polluting vehicles improves health? on 12:11 - Aug 19 with 453 views | Jasper |
| So reducing heavy polluting vehicles improves health? on 11:01 - Aug 19 by Guthrum | Tho how many care workers are driving non-ULEZ-compliant cars? Most small petrol runarounds will be exempt (due to engine size). Even my 16-year-old 1.6L petrol people carrier is. |
There was also a scrappage scheme that paid you £2,000 to scrap a non-compliant vehicle My father in law did this with a diesel Ford Focus that was only worth £500 at most, so I imagine the number of people that were negatively impacted was tiny. |  | |  | Login to get fewer ads
| So reducing heavy polluting vehicles improves health? on 13:26 - Aug 19 with 321 views | balcombeblue |
| So reducing heavy polluting vehicles improves health? on 12:11 - Aug 19 by Jasper | There was also a scrappage scheme that paid you £2,000 to scrap a non-compliant vehicle My father in law did this with a diesel Ford Focus that was only worth £500 at most, so I imagine the number of people that were negatively impacted was tiny. |
I have rather (sadly) spent some of lunchtime reading how the study was adjusted for Covid traffic, the move to EVs and a host of other factors. I find these studies, their data and conclusions interesting. |  | |  |
| |