| Today's judgement..... 09:45 - Sep 24 with 4208 views | BanksterDebtSlave |
.......will 52/48 count? |  |
| |  |
| Today's judgement..... on 09:53 - Sep 24 with 4183 views | Guthrum |
The Government reckons they'll ignore it anyway, so what's the difference? |  |
| |
| Today's judgement..... on 10:32 - Sep 24 with 4153 views | homer_123 |
| Today's judgement..... on 09:53 - Sep 24 by Guthrum |
The Government reckons they'll ignore it anyway, so what's the difference? |
That's not true - they've said they'll abide by the ruling but seek to prorouge again. |  |
| |
| Today's judgement..... on 10:34 - Sep 24 with 4152 views | Guthrum |
| Today's judgement..... on 10:32 - Sep 24 by homer_123 |
That's not true - they've said they'll abide by the ruling but seek to prorouge again. |
TBH, I suspect the courts will rule it non judiciable, anyway. | |
| |
| Today's judgement..... on 10:34 - Sep 24 with 4149 views | uefacup81 |
| Today's judgement..... on 10:32 - Sep 24 by homer_123 |
That's not true - they've said they'll abide by the ruling but seek to prorouge again. |
In which case I would hope that Her Maj will break with centuries of convention and say to Boris, when presented with his new 'legitimate' reason:
"Pull the other one Bozza, it's got f*cking bells on". |  |
| |
| Apparently it is justicable on 10:37 - Sep 24 with 4142 views | Guthrum |
| Today's judgement..... on 10:34 - Sep 24 by Guthrum |
TBH, I suspect the courts will rule it non judiciable, anyway. |
Unanimously, which is somewhat surprising. [Post edited 24 Sep 2019 10:38]
| |
| |
| Apparently it is on 10:38 - Sep 24 with 4132 views | uefacup81 |
| Apparently it is justicable on 10:37 - Sep 24 by Guthrum |
Unanimously, which is somewhat surprising. [Post edited 24 Sep 2019 10:38]
|
Huh?
From what I see it's been ruled to sit within the purview of the courts. | |
| |
| Apparently it is on 10:39 - Sep 24 with 4125 views | Guthrum |
| Apparently it is on 10:38 - Sep 24 by uefacup81 |
Huh?
From what I see it's been ruled to sit within the purview of the courts. |
Sorry, that was what i meant, edited. | |
| |
| Today's judgement..... on 10:39 - Sep 24 with 4122 views | homer_123 |
| Today's judgement..... on 10:34 - Sep 24 by Guthrum |
TBH, I suspect the courts will rule it non judiciable, anyway. |
Ruling can be made by the court | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Apparently it is on 10:40 - Sep 24 with 4122 views | Guthrum |
| Apparently it is on 10:38 - Sep 24 by uefacup81 |
Huh?
From what I see it's been ruled to sit within the purview of the courts. |
Government in trouble - using it to silence Parliament would be unlawful. | |
| |
| Apparently it is on 10:41 - Sep 24 with 4111 views | homer_123 |
| Apparently it is on 10:40 - Sep 24 by Guthrum |
Government in trouble - using it to silence Parliament would be unlawful. |
I can't see how the Courts have said its within preview and then rule it lawful.
Surely Johnson is now f*cked? | |
| |
| Apparently it is on 10:43 - Sep 24 with 4095 views | Guthrum |
| Apparently it is on 10:41 - Sep 24 by homer_123 |
I can't see how the Courts have said its within preview and then rule it lawful.
Surely Johnson is now f*cked? |
Ouch - unlawful.
They could have done, taking the Government's advice at face value. But they haven't.
Unanimously. [Post edited 24 Sep 2019 10:44]
| |
| |
| Apparently it is on 10:44 - Sep 24 with 4087 views | homer_123 |
| Apparently it is on 10:43 - Sep 24 by Guthrum |
Ouch - unlawful.
They could have done, taking the Government's advice at face value. But they haven't.
Unanimously. [Post edited 24 Sep 2019 10:44]
|
Surely, that's him done? He's got to go? | |
| |
| Apparently it is on 10:46 - Sep 24 with 4075 views | DanTheMan |
| Apparently it is on 10:44 - Sep 24 by homer_123 |
Surely, that's him done? He's got to go? |
No you see, if you're rich and break the law it doesn't really matter. |  |
| |
| Apparently it is on 10:46 - Sep 24 with 4072 views | Guthrum |
| Apparently it is on 10:44 - Sep 24 by homer_123 |
Surely, that's him done? He's got to go? |
It pretty much says he lied to the Queen and power over the meeting of Parliament has been taken away from him.
But that still doesn't force Johnson out, if he has the brass neck to refuse to budge. | |
| |
| Apparently it is on 10:47 - Sep 24 with 4063 views | homer_123 |
| Apparently it is on 10:46 - Sep 24 by Guthrum |
It pretty much says he lied to the Queen and power over the meeting of Parliament has been taken away from him.
But that still doesn't force Johnson out, if he has the brass neck to refuse to budge. |
Which he will.
He's already stated he'll seek a second prorougement (sp?)? | |
| |
| Apparently it is on 10:47 - Sep 24 with 4060 views | homer_123 |
| Apparently it is on 10:46 - Sep 24 by DanTheMan |
No you see, if you're rich and break the law it doesn't really matter. |
I won't argue that point. | |
| |
| Today's judgement..... on 10:51 - Sep 24 with 4048 views | Samuelowen88 |
Can't see that her Maj will be best pleased.
As he forms a government with her permission, is this now when she removes her permission? |  |
| |
| Apparently it is on 11:03 - Sep 24 with 4027 views | Guthrum |
| Apparently it is on 10:47 - Sep 24 by homer_123 |
Which he will.
He's already stated he'll seek a second prorougement (sp?)? |
Tho it will have to be much shorter (that being something specifically mentioned in the judgement). Also, a judgement like this sets precedent. A new attempt to prorogue could equally be challenged, its rationale questioned. | |
| |
| Today's judgement..... on 11:20 - Sep 24 with 4000 views | homer_123 |
| Today's judgement..... on 10:51 - Sep 24 by Samuelowen88 |
Can't see that her Maj will be best pleased.
As he forms a government with her permission, is this now when she removes her permission? |
She won't - generally she/ royals don't get involved in politics. | |
| |
| Today's judgement..... on 11:21 - Sep 24 with 3999 views | Ftnfwest |
doesn't usually |  | | |
| Today's judgement..... on 11:36 - Sep 24 with 3982 views | Guthrum |
| Today's judgement..... on 11:20 - Sep 24 by homer_123 |
She won't - generally she/ royals don't get involved in politics. |
But in this case she has been deliberately misled by members of her Council. That's pretty serious. | |
| |
| Today's judgement..... on 12:53 - Sep 24 with 3617 views | BtreeBlueBlood |
| Today's judgement..... on 10:51 - Sep 24 by Samuelowen88 |
Can't see that her Maj will be best pleased.
As he forms a government with her permission, is this now when she removes her permission? |
Its got to be election time - as Boris has asked.
Its going to be a bloodbath |  | | |
| Today's judgement..... on 13:37 - Sep 24 with 3306 views | homer_123 |
| Today's judgement..... on 11:36 - Sep 24 by Guthrum |
But in this case she has been deliberately misled by members of her Council. That's pretty serious. |
Not saying it isn't serious. But she has never wanted to be dragged into politics. One suspects she'll keep afar from this. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
