| David Conn on the Man City FFP Ruling is interesting on 08:19 - Jul 14 with 1144 views | sparks |
In fairness to him- he does note the key point, albeit in passing- which is that the main big allegation was dismissed because it was not proven, rather than because of obstruction or time barring... Of course- thats not such a good story. |  |
| The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to the presence of those who think they've found it.
(Sir Terry Pratchett) | | Poll: | Is Fred drunk this morning? |
|  |
| David Conn on the Man City FFP Ruling is interesting on 10:22 - Jul 14 with 1032 views | BrianTablet |
| David Conn on the Man City FFP Ruling is interesting on 08:19 - Jul 14 by sparks |
In fairness to him- he does note the key point, albeit in passing- which is that the main big allegation was dismissed because it was not proven, rather than because of obstruction or time barring... Of course- thats not such a good story. |
And - despite being innocent - they obstructed the investigation because.....? |  |
| |
| David Conn on the Man City FFP Ruling is interesting on 12:43 - Jul 14 with 961 views | Illinoisblue |
Despite being a City fan he’s always fair and reasonable when reporting on them. |  |
| |
| David Conn on the Man City FFP Ruling is interesting on 12:50 - Jul 14 with 939 views | sparks |
| David Conn on the Man City FFP Ruling is interesting on 10:22 - Jul 14 by BrianTablet |
And - despite being innocent - they obstructed the investigation because.....? |
Whatever the reasons and obstructions- they were not sufficient to persuade an independent body of guilt... | |
| The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to the presence of those who think they've found it.
(Sir Terry Pratchett) | | Poll: | Is Fred drunk this morning? |
| |
| David Conn on the Man City FFP Ruling is interesting on 13:26 - Jul 14 with 890 views | JammyDodgerrr |
| David Conn on the Man City FFP Ruling is interesting on 10:22 - Jul 14 by BrianTablet |
And - despite being innocent - they obstructed the investigation because.....? |
Presumably because City knew they were right, and they refused to help UEFA because they don't like them. That's all it really comes down to. |  |
| |
| David Conn on the Man City FFP Ruling is interesting on 14:06 - Jul 14 with 843 views | longtimefan |
| David Conn on the Man City FFP Ruling is interesting on 12:43 - Jul 14 by Illinoisblue |
Despite being a City fan he’s always fair and reasonable when reporting on them. |
Their stated reason, I have no way to judge its legitimacy, was that UEFA kept leaking information City supplied to them. So they stopped providing further information.
Edit: Replied to wrong post. Should have been BT’s post. [Post edited 14 Jul 2020 14:08]
|  | | |
| David Conn on the Man City FFP Ruling is interesting on 06:33 - Jul 15 with 740 views | Keaneish |
The article says that the PL brought in their own financial fair play rules that “reined in over spending on players wages.” If this is the case, any idea how United bent the rules to sign Sanchez on a reported £500k a week? |  |
| |
| David Conn on the Man City FFP Ruling is interesting on 12:00 - Jul 15 with 621 views | oldburian |
| David Conn on the Man City FFP Ruling is interesting on 06:33 - Jul 15 by Keaneish |
The article says that the PL brought in their own financial fair play rules that “reined in over spending on players wages.” If this is the case, any idea how United bent the rules to sign Sanchez on a reported £500k a week? |
But United are part of the clique and City are not. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| David Conn on the Man City FFP Ruling is interesting on 13:44 - Jul 15 with 590 views | JammyDodgerrr |
| David Conn on the Man City FFP Ruling is interesting on 06:33 - Jul 15 by Keaneish |
The article says that the PL brought in their own financial fair play rules that “reined in over spending on players wages.” If this is the case, any idea how United bent the rules to sign Sanchez on a reported £500k a week? |
I haven't read the PL version of FFP but i imagine it is just because United make a huge amount of revenue from all over the world, that the wages actually fit in the structure. City are certainly bigger here now, but United have been the biggest club in the world for some time with extraordinary revenues. I think they only stopped being number 1 over the last few years, think it is Barca now but might be wrong on that. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
