| No matter how many times I watch it 23:32 - Jul 7 with 377 views | GeoffSentence |
I can't figure out why that foul on Kane wasnt given as a penalty |  |
| |  |
| 100% a penalty more so than Sterlings (n/t) on 23:34 - Jul 7 with 362 views | unstableblue |
|  |
| |
| 100% a penalty more so than Sterlings (n/t) on 23:37 - Jul 7 with 336 views | positivity |
| 100% a penalty more so than Sterlings (n/t) on 23:34 - Jul 7 by unstableblue |
|
agreed, but can see why neither were overturned by var as an "obvious error", both were arguable/could be easily missed |  |
| |
| 100% a penalty more so than Sterlings (n/t) on 23:45 - Jul 7 with 294 views | clive_baker |
| 100% a penalty more so than Sterlings (n/t) on 23:37 - Jul 7 by positivity |
agreed, but can see why neither were overturned by var as an "obvious error", both were arguable/could be easily missed |
Quite. If the one on Kane was given (which it should have been) then VAR wouldn’t have overturned. Equally had Sterling’s not been, then VAR wouldn’t have given it. I like this use of VAR, let the refs ref and only intervene for anything glaringly wrong, rather than consulting a monitor every 2 seconds. The premier league should take note. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
