| Not for the first time, McKenna's substitutions seemed to disrupt Town 17:05 - Feb 11 with 934 views | Radlett_blue |
rather than the opposition & we lost our momentum & Wednesday looked more likely than us to land a late winner.
We also now never seem to play the same defence 2 games running & that can't be helpful & may have contributed to a shakey first half in which we could easily have gone 3-0 down. |  |
| |  |
| Not for the first time, McKenna's substitutions seemed to disrupt Town on 17:09 - Feb 11 with 870 views | BarcaBlue |
They were subs that were needed to be made. Wednesday attacked for about 5 minutes in the second half and Ladapo had the best of the late chances. |  | | |
| Not for the first time, McKenna's substitutions seemed to disrupt Town on 17:10 - Feb 11 with 857 views | SitfcB |
They were good subs to make and at the right times but none of them ahead an affect on the game at all. |  |
| |
| Not for the first time, McKenna's substitutions seemed to disrupt Town on 17:38 - Feb 11 with 706 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
That’s a bit of a stretch.
The game was at a high tempo, the subs slowed the tempo but Hirst was dead on his feet and Chaplin was starting to look ragged. |  |
| |
| Not for the first time, McKenna's substitutions seemed to disrupt Town on 17:45 - Feb 11 with 640 views | Vic |
I was listening on to Radio Suffolk - didn’t sound to me like we needed to make subs at that point, we were still very much in the ascendency. I assume that KM made them with the intention of ensuring momentum continued as it was, rather than trying to pick it up after we’d dropped a bit. In which case they were a positive move.
Didn’t really sound as though it worked though as we gradually did what we tend to do - go into our shell and invite pressure for the last sedition of the game. Such a shame that we cannot (do not) keep our foot on the gas for a whole game) |  |
| |
| Not for the first time, McKenna's substitutions seemed to disrupt Town on 18:12 - Feb 11 with 567 views | pointofblue |
| Not for the first time, McKenna's substitutions seemed to disrupt Town on 17:10 - Feb 11 by SitfcB |
They were good subs to make and at the right times but none of them ahead an affect on the game at all. |
Not sure - Burns and Broadhead had to go off because of tiredness and injury, and I could understand Aluko coming on (for Chaplin, rather than waiting for Broadhead) to be injured, but I did not get Ladapo for Hirst. Ladapo rarely performs as a sub and we didn't seem as sharp after then. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
