| Cameron Archer... 15:24 - Jul 11 with 2142 views | Kieran_Knows |
... wonder if this has any effect on Philogene back to Villa/us?
|  |
| |  |
| Cameron Archer... on 15:58 - Jul 11 with 1834 views | ParisBlue |
Was always the case as I understand it. Sheffield Utd bought for £18m with villa having an obligation to buy for £14m if they (Sheffield United) were relegated.
So a £4m loan fee. |  |
| |
| Cameron Archer... on 15:59 - Jul 11 with 1808 views | FrimleyBlue |
wonder if villa got on the blower
hey ashton, we're gonna take back philogene, but we'll let you have Archer instead... |  |
| |
| Cameron Archer... on 16:15 - Jul 11 with 1586 views | Metal_Hacker |
I’m just getting all confused with it all now which doesn’t really take much I know but ffs |  |
| |
| Cameron Archer... on 16:37 - Jul 11 with 1367 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
Clearly a away around the prem loans limit. |  |
| |
| Cameron Archer... on 17:04 - Jul 11 with 1192 views | Asa |
Presumably they had an option not an obligation? Would seem odd to make it obligatory from Villa's perspective.
In which case they are running around trying to comply with PSR and have dropped £14m on Archer, a player who doesn't improve their first eleven or arguably even bench options, which makes it very unlikely they are also wanting to drop another £14m or so (even with the discount) on Philogene, another player who doesn't make them immediately stronger.
If this was a few days from now would say this bodes well for us, but also that they haven't just decided to buy Archer today so this would have been going on alongside matching the Philogene fee. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
