| Davis Non pen 18:59 - Aug 24 with 1371 views | FrimleyBlue |
Didn't realise it wasn't even reviewed.
That's a bit odd isn't it.
Did the ball need to go out sooner to be able to have VAR? |  |
| |  |
| Davis Non pen on 19:01 - Aug 24 with 1329 views | berkstractorboy |
Don't believe there is any time limit to when it can be reviewed but it can only be dealt with at the next break in play. I thought in these cases VAR would review the incident in parallel to the game continuing, but maybe they only do that if instructed to by the ref? |  | | |
| Davis Non pen on 19:06 - Aug 24 with 1246 views | billlm |
Penalty, it's city you don't get them |  | | |
| Davis Non pen on 19:09 - Aug 24 with 1171 views | Rozz |
On the commentary it was mentioned that it had been checked. |  | | |
| Davis Non pen on 19:21 - Aug 24 with 1031 views | ArnieM |
“ lil ole Ipswich” are going to get this bias all season now so best we all get used to it I think. |  |
| |
| Davis Non pen on 19:34 - Aug 24 with 918 views | JammyDodgerrr |
Everything is checked, there isn't a 'it wasn't looked at' situation. Pundits are, and have been, wrong on this for years. They clearly didn't feel like it was intervention-worthy, which is confusing given the intervention on the first. |  |
| |
| Davis Non pen on 19:35 - Aug 24 with 903 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Davis Non pen on 19:34 - Aug 24 by JammyDodgerrr |
Everything is checked, there isn't a 'it wasn't looked at' situation. Pundits are, and have been, wrong on this for years. They clearly didn't feel like it was intervention-worthy, which is confusing given the intervention on the first. |
Ah. It was KM who said the 4th official told him it hadn't been reviewed. | |
| |
| Davis Non pen on 19:35 - Aug 24 with 893 views | TractorWood |
I thought theirs would be given as Leif's challenge looked sloppy.
I thought ours was a decent shout. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
