| Just seen the philogene cross again 23:53 - Nov 25 with 777 views | FrimleyBlue |
That's a peach of a ball in.
Sure defending is questionable. But its a bloody good ball in.
Think we really saw the differences between philly and clarke tonight
Philogene can sometimes be frustrating but youre never sure where hes going to go with the ball sometimes and he works really well with davis.
Clarke.. I feel hes to easy to defend against. He opens his body up quite easily when turning inside and offers an easy interception imo. There's not many surprises by him to twise and turn defenders..
I like clarke. And hes popped up with some goals so far this season but I do feel hes a finisher rather than a starter. Just got to find a way of making the most of philogoeme in games more. |  |
| |  |
| Just seen the philogene cross again on 09:10 - Nov 26 with 500 views | TractorJack |
Clarke is brilliant with space to drive in to but can struggle to impact otherwise. Probably why he's been so good off the bench. They really congested the middle of the pitch so was difficult night for him but that's the beauty of having both of them. |  | | |
| Just seen the philogene cross again on 09:13 - Nov 26 with 477 views | SheffordBlue |
There have also been games when Philogene has started where he's been marked out of the game and not been able to impact it - I think it's as much a function of who starts and who finishes rather than who is better.
McKenna seemed to back this up with some of his post-match comments where he highlighted the work that Clarke did contributed to Philogene being able to impact the game. |  |
| |
| Just seen the philogene cross again on 09:25 - Nov 26 with 440 views | vilanovablue |
I thought Jack didn't get masses of support today. First half we seemed to have so few players showing for the ball. We did however defend excellently. I think some of the passing was sloppy but I wonder if the pitch was as poor as McKenna suggested which may have contributed, it certainly seemed to be running slowly. Once again the subs made a big difference and we get the result. 14 points from 18 is certainly much improved form. Back to back clean sheets to boot. I'd agree the Philogene cross was an absolute peach. |  | | |
| I thought it was essentially a defensive error… on 10:56 - Nov 26 with 312 views | unstableblue |
… and that bit of luck we’ve been missing in front of goal
But Philogene is clever, the cross loops up and down in quite a sharp arc, so that it clears the defender rather than something he can easily cut out
Of course he should have read it better, but it’s good from Jaden
And of course Nunez (who’d had some poor moments previously) snuck in really well
I think both Jaden and Philogene are both good… and I’d keep giving them 60/30 minutes stints on rotation or based on the opposition
There just weren’t enough players close enough to jack last night |  |
| |
| I thought it was essentially a defensive error… on 11:03 - Nov 26 with 282 views | Metal_Hacker |
| I thought it was essentially a defensive error… on 10:56 - Nov 26 by unstableblue |
… and that bit of luck we’ve been missing in front of goal
But Philogene is clever, the cross loops up and down in quite a sharp arc, so that it clears the defender rather than something he can easily cut out
Of course he should have read it better, but it’s good from Jaden
And of course Nunez (who’d had some poor moments previously) snuck in really well
I think both Jaden and Philogene are both good… and I’d keep giving them 60/30 minutes stints on rotation or based on the opposition
There just weren’t enough players close enough to jack last night |
He has a twin ?  |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
