| Controversial thread designed to attract attention 15:39 - Mar 27 with 1653 views | grow_our_own | I know almost everyone wants Ashton gone for politicising the club and then lying about it, but I have a "devil's advocate" view. I know there are around 20 similar threads like this, but I won't receive as much attention if I just add to them. So I've decided to start a new thread that starts as follows. I'm no great fan of Reform, but have you considered that Mark Ashton once came across a goose, and *didn't* say boo to it? Plus, I'm no fan of Nigel Farage, but we wouldn't be having this conversation if MA had held a publicity event for the Green Party, made ITFC officially anti-NATO, and decked the tunnel with "Polanski 10" shirts. Switching to a leadership team that doesn't use the club as a Reform promotion vehicle will be too distracting for Kieran and the team. The best thing to do at this stage of the season is to pretend this week didn't happen, and get behind the team! All as one, and one for all! I know I'm going to get downvotes and negative replies for this, but I've stayed in the silent majority for long enough. Glad I could get that off my chest. |  | | |  |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 15:45 - Mar 27 with 1137 views | StokieBlue | The "Polanski" narrative that a subset of posters are pushing on here is very weird. SB |  |
| Avatar - M101 - Pinwheel Galaxy |
|  |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 15:45 - Mar 27 with 1136 views | CastroSito | is it something you want to get off your chest, or a devils advocate view? |  | |  |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 15:50 - Mar 27 with 1087 views | andyblue231 | In life, have you generally found that the 'pretend it didn't happen' approach tends to work? |  | |  |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 15:51 - Mar 27 with 1064 views | MaySixth | Why would anyone not get behind the team? |  |
|  |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 15:52 - Mar 27 with 1057 views | urbanpenguin | Did you really need a whole new thread when commenting here would do? "There wouldn't be this outrage if it was Starmer or Polanski" by urbanpenguin 27 Mar 12:35Actually, I don't agree with this entirely.
It fundamentally would not have happened with eg Starmer or Polanski, or even Badenoch.
Yes, they may organise a visit to the club, and as is normal with such political press junkets there would be meet and greats with the community team, womens team, youth, etc etc, then there would be an (often clunky) policy announcement or pr moment that shoehorns in the community work or outreach of the club with some policy statement or ambition.
What Farage did, and now seemingly with the OK of Ashton, was demonstrably not that. It was cheap, it was using the club but not in any meaningful way other than leverage, and then doubling down with nasty jokey social media posts about being right wing and McKenna leaving. It was unprofessional from all involved.
I simply can't imagine any other party or politician doing that, so this "if it was Starmer" to me is moot. Starmer, Polanski, Badenoch etc - regardless of politics - would be professional, above board, and not abuse the hosts in the way Farage did, and often does. |  | |  |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 15:54 - Mar 27 with 1039 views | grow_our_own |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 15:45 - Mar 27 by CastroSito | is it something you want to get off your chest, or a devils advocate view? |
Damn you Castro. You've sussed that my new thread wasn't from a place of good faith, but intended only to quench my thirst for attention. [Post edited 27 Mar 15:56]
|  | |  |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 15:56 - Mar 27 with 1021 views | lowhouseblue |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 15:45 - Mar 27 by CastroSito | is it something you want to get off your chest, or a devils advocate view? |
whereas of course if you want to add to your chest the polanski shirt may be just the thing you're looking for. |  |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
|  |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 15:58 - Mar 27 with 1009 views | grow_our_own |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 15:52 - Mar 27 by urbanpenguin | Did you really need a whole new thread when commenting here would do? "There wouldn't be this outrage if it was Starmer or Polanski" by urbanpenguin 27 Mar 12:35Actually, I don't agree with this entirely.
It fundamentally would not have happened with eg Starmer or Polanski, or even Badenoch.
Yes, they may organise a visit to the club, and as is normal with such political press junkets there would be meet and greats with the community team, womens team, youth, etc etc, then there would be an (often clunky) policy announcement or pr moment that shoehorns in the community work or outreach of the club with some policy statement or ambition.
What Farage did, and now seemingly with the OK of Ashton, was demonstrably not that. It was cheap, it was using the club but not in any meaningful way other than leverage, and then doubling down with nasty jokey social media posts about being right wing and McKenna leaving. It was unprofessional from all involved.
I simply can't imagine any other party or politician doing that, so this "if it was Starmer" to me is moot. Starmer, Polanski, Badenoch etc - regardless of politics - would be professional, above board, and not abuse the hosts in the way Farage did, and often does. |
Lol - satire is dead. [Post edited 27 Mar 15:58]
|  | |  | Login to get fewer ads
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 15:58 - Mar 27 with 1006 views | CastroSito |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 15:56 - Mar 27 by lowhouseblue | whereas of course if you want to add to your chest the polanski shirt may be just the thing you're looking for. |
if I want to add to my chest? What on earth are you blabbering on about? |  | |  |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 15:59 - Mar 27 with 985 views | urbanpenguin |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 15:58 - Mar 27 by grow_our_own | Lol - satire is dead. [Post edited 27 Mar 15:58]
|
Only sh¡t satire is dead. |  | |  |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:11 - Mar 27 with 922 views | vilanovablue | I don't want any party using Ipswich as a tool to create content regardless of who it may be. The fact a racist and homophobic party did so is something I'm probably even less happy about but the above stands. The fact it has been shrouded in lies and misinformation is also unforgivable. [Post edited 27 Mar 17:23]
|  | |  |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:17 - Mar 27 with 869 views | grow_our_own |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:11 - Mar 27 by vilanovablue | I don't want any party using Ipswich as a tool to create content regardless of who it may be. The fact a racist and homophobic party did so is something I'm probably even less happy about but the above stands. The fact it has been shrouded in lies and misinformation is also unforgivable. [Post edited 27 Mar 17:23]
|
You say that, but nobody has addressed my point about Mark Ashton not routinely saying boo to geese. Until someone here provides evidence to the contrary, whether Mark should be considering his position should at best be 50/50. [Post edited 27 Mar 17:20]
|  | |  |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:21 - Mar 27 with 826 views | lowhouseblue |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 15:58 - Mar 27 by CastroSito | if I want to add to my chest? What on earth are you blabbering on about? |
too subtle eh. (note to self, may need to dumb it down a bit). |  |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
|  |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:22 - Mar 27 with 819 views | CastroSito |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:21 - Mar 27 by lowhouseblue | too subtle eh. (note to self, may need to dumb it down a bit). |
Yeah, go on, dumb it down for me. I'm all ears. |  | |  |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:25 - Mar 27 with 767 views | lowhouseblue |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:22 - Mar 27 by CastroSito | Yeah, go on, dumb it down for me. I'm all ears. |
ah, that's where you're going wrong. it's all being typed. |  |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
|  |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:26 - Mar 27 with 759 views | CastroSito |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:25 - Mar 27 by lowhouseblue | ah, that's where you're going wrong. it's all being typed. |
Go on, explain the joke. |  | |  |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:28 - Mar 27 with 732 views | The_Flashing_Smile | You've posted loads on this subject, in what way are you the silent majority? |  |
|  |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:28 - Mar 27 with 735 views | grow_our_own | My thread has received a down-vote. How dare you! Wokerati shutting down debate again. No freedom of speech these days. Like bloody Shakira Law round here. [Post edited 27 Mar 16:30]
|  | |  |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:28 - Mar 27 with 727 views | lowhouseblue |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:26 - Mar 27 by CastroSito | Go on, explain the joke. |
you're all ears so you're trying to hear the thread rather than read it. a mistake. it really wasn't a difficult one. |  |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
|  |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:29 - Mar 27 with 711 views | CastroSito |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:28 - Mar 27 by lowhouseblue | you're all ears so you're trying to hear the thread rather than read it. a mistake. it really wasn't a difficult one. |
"whereas of course if you want to add to your chest the polanski shirt may be just the thing you're looking for." No, that comment. |  | |  |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:30 - Mar 27 with 708 views | bluebud |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:17 - Mar 27 by grow_our_own | You say that, but nobody has addressed my point about Mark Ashton not routinely saying boo to geese. Until someone here provides evidence to the contrary, whether Mark should be considering his position should at best be 50/50. [Post edited 27 Mar 17:20]
|
I say booo to you rather than gooses |  | |  |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:32 - Mar 27 with 672 views | lowhouseblue |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:29 - Mar 27 by CastroSito | "whereas of course if you want to add to your chest the polanski shirt may be just the thing you're looking for." No, that comment. |
that, as you well know, was a reference to polanski's claim that he can magically increase the size of women's breasts. your turn. a horse goes into a bar and the barman says "why the long face?" so, why's that funny? |  |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
|  |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:33 - Mar 27 with 660 views | grow_our_own |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:30 - Mar 27 by bluebud | I say booo to you rather than gooses |
I hereby feign great offence, and respond in kind to your insult, hoping for another reply. |  | |  |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:34 - Mar 27 with 648 views | CastroSito |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:32 - Mar 27 by lowhouseblue | that, as you well know, was a reference to polanski's claim that he can magically increase the size of women's breasts. your turn. a horse goes into a bar and the barman says "why the long face?" so, why's that funny? |
why would a shirt increase the size of my chest? |  | |  |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:37 - Mar 27 with 618 views | lowhouseblue |
| Controversial thread designed to attract attention on 16:34 - Mar 27 by CastroSito | why would a shirt increase the size of my chest? |
Exactly. and why would polanski do the same? you're getting there. but generally humour works better when you do some of this work yourself. |  |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
|  |
| |