Offsides and VAR 13:07 - Oct 18 with 488 views | Bluefish | I hate VAR and never wanted it, if we have to have it. It should be offsides that can be seen by the eye. I am confused though by the Mane one yesterday, I thought the part of the body to be offsides had to be a goalscoring part of the body I.e. hands and arms don't count. I'm sure that I heard that last season but it can't be right? | |
| | |
Offsides and VAR on 13:37 - Oct 18 with 440 views | Trequartista | The biggest nonsense is that a still frame is being presented as evidence, yet a foot ('when the ball is kicked') may be in contact with the ball for several hundred milliseconds. [Post edited 18 Oct 2020 13:37]
| |
| |
Offsides and VAR on 13:42 - Oct 18 with 425 views | longtimefan |
Offsides and VAR on 13:37 - Oct 18 by Trequartista | The biggest nonsense is that a still frame is being presented as evidence, yet a foot ('when the ball is kicked') may be in contact with the ball for several hundred milliseconds. [Post edited 18 Oct 2020 13:37]
|
The accuracy they try to resolve it is all a bit of a nonsense when a picture is only taken every 20ms. | | | |
Offsides and VAR on 14:04 - Oct 18 with 385 views | m14_blue | VAR is just horsesh1t. How can anyone think it’s a good idea? Baffling. | | | |
Offsides and VAR on 14:09 - Oct 18 with 380 views | Basuco | You seem surprised that Premier League referee's are highly inconsistent, they sill make basic errors even after watching it many times in slow motion, it makes no difference real time on the pitch or many times in slow motion, the rules of football are not applied consistently. | | | |
Offsides and VAR on 14:16 - Oct 18 with 368 views | Ftnfwest | It’s all rubbish tbh. But in that instance the reverse is that it could have been hands and arms playing him onside. | | | |
| |