Forum | Highlightswww.skysports.com/football/sland-vs-ipswich/430940Red card - s by HARRY10

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Highlightswww.skysports.com/football/sland-vs-ipswich/430940Red card - s 22:59 - Nov 3 with 950 views

https://www.skysports.com/football/sland-vs-ipswich/430940

Red card - tackling with studs showing

Penalty - hits his arm

The latter may now be the 'letter of the law' but the hand ball rule was NEVER intended to penalise something like that.

Should never be a penalty

Highlightswww.skysports.com/football/sland-vs-ipswich/430940Red card - s on 07:46 - Nov 4 with 774 views

braveblue

Rubbish

He was pushed into the tackle and never a red card.

Law changed a couple of weeks ago. Not handball if not looking and accidental.

Ref should be demoted.

Highlightswww.skysports.com/football/sland-vs-ipswich/430940Red card - s on 07:50 - Nov 4 with 767 views

Durovigutum

The key part of Law 12,
it is not an offence if the ball touches a player’s hand/arm:

directly from the player’s own head or body (including the foot)

directly from the head or body (including the foot) of another player who is close

if the hand/arm is close to the body and does not make the body unnaturally bigger

when a player falls and the hand/arm is between the body and the ground to support the body, but not extended laterally or vertically away from the body

Highlightswww.skysports.com/football/sland-vs-ipswich/430940Red card - s on 07:51 - Nov 4 with 764 views

Durovigutum

Highlightswww.skysports.com/football/sland-vs-ipswich/430940Red card - s on 07:46 - Nov 4 by braveblue
Rubbish He was pushed into the tackle and never a red card. Law changed a couple of weeks ago. Not handball if not looking and accidental. Ref should be demoted.

Law didn't change, the Premier League refs were told to interpret it slightly differently. Problem is there are a number of areas were interpretation is different, see the red card.

Highlightswww.skysports.com/football/sland-vs-ipswich/430940Red card - s on 07:52 - Nov 4 with 757 views

Chrisd

That second opportunity for Lankester that ball wouldn't quite sit down enough for him.

Poll:

Where are we going to finish?

Highlightswww.skysports.com/football/sland-vs-ipswich/430940Red card - s on 08:26 - Nov 4 with 694 views

Swansea_Blue

T-shirt interpretation innit. There's no way penalties should be awarded for things like that though.

Poll:

Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

Highlightswww.skysports.com/football/sland-vs-ipswich/430940Red card - s on 09:45 - Nov 4 with 568 views

ITFC_96

It's a stupid penalty.

The "handball" actually put the ball into a more dangerous position. There was no way he could have avoided that because it was right next to him and there was absolutely no benefit gained from it.

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread