Forum | Bishop or Pigott? by Keaneish

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Bishop or Pigott? 13:55 - Jun 6 with 1356 views

Given Pigott is out of contract and Bishop still has a year to run, I’m surprised we’ve not had stronger links with Pigott compared to Bishop. I’d have thought that Pigott’s performances against us and his more prolific record would have made him a primary target.

What does Bishop offer for a fee that Pigott doesn’t for free?

Poll:	Who would be your managerial preference between these two?
Blog:	[Blog] Â£2.65 Million and Waiting?

Bishop or Pigott? on 13:59 - Jun 6 with 1322 views

JimmyJazz

Particulary as the Accrington chairman suggests the fee would have to be 1 million+

Pigott is 3 years older - but at 27 should be at his peak

Poll:	If we could perm sign just one, which would it be?
Blog:	Top Championship Teams?

Bishop or Pigott? on 14:00 - Jun 6 with 1314 views

saffers12

Bishop or Pigott? on 13:59 - Jun 6 by JimmyJazz
Particulary as the Accrington chairman suggests the fee would have to be 1 million+ Pigott is 3 years older - but at 27 should be at his peak

Pigott slightly better on the ball but Bishop

Bishop or Pigott? on 14:14 - Jun 6 with 1248 views

Devereuxxx

Given the additional financial constraints on clubs this season, I can see a lower-end Championship team taking a punt on Pigott, as a fairly cheap option in good form. That's what he'll be holding out for at least.

Bishop or Pigott? on 14:38 - Jun 6 with 1127 views

Wakh

Piggots sign on fee = wages.

Bishop or Pigott? on 14:54 - Jun 6 with 1032 views

townblue

I would probably have made piggott my main target this summer. Not sure if that lacks ambition, but I was very impressed with what I saw from him this season.

Bishop or Pigott? on 23:46 - Jun 6 with 742 views

Wallingford_Boy

Wyke.

RIP Sir Bobby

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread