| Today's twitter winner is... 10:12 - Dec 21 with 1180 views | bluelagos |
"select all squares with a various obvious party"
|  |
| |  |
| Today's twitter winner is... on 10:16 - Dec 21 with 1144 views | Steve_M |
With an honourable mention for this:
|  |
| |
| Today's twitter winner is... on 10:21 - Dec 21 with 1111 views | bluelagos |
| Today's twitter winner is... on 10:16 - Dec 21 by Steve_M |
With an honourable mention for this:
|
You mean the NHS don't give out free hand jobs to those claiming they've chundered and shat a load of blood post vaccination? | |
| |
| Today's twitter winner is... on 10:29 - Dec 21 with 1078 views | BlueBadger |
Idle thought on this: This is either a social gathering(which would have been illegal at the time) OR an official government meeting with a spouse who, at the time, had no formal role in government. Which surely would have been a breach of the Official Secrets Act?
Either way, it's a police matter, right? |  |
| |
| Today's twitter winner is... on 10:35 - Dec 21 with 1020 views | Beckets |
| Today's twitter winner is... on 10:29 - Dec 21 by BlueBadger |
Idle thought on this: This is either a social gathering(which would have been illegal at the time) OR an official government meeting with a spouse who, at the time, had no formal role in government. Which surely would have been a breach of the Official Secrets Act?
Either way, it's a police matter, right? |
No it took place over a year ago didn’t it? In which case the Justice Secretary Dominic Raab has told us that the Police will not be investigating any potential crimes which took place over a year ago. |  | | |
| Today's twitter winner is... on 10:40 - Dec 21 with 979 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Today's twitter winner is... on 10:16 - Dec 21 by Steve_M |
With an honourable mention for this:
|
 No wonder Badger's been a bit coy on where he works and exactly what he does  |  |
| |
| Today's twitter winner is... on 10:41 - Dec 21 with 973 views | bluelagos |
| Today's twitter winner is... on 10:29 - Dec 21 by BlueBadger |
Idle thought on this: This is either a social gathering(which would have been illegal at the time) OR an official government meeting with a spouse who, at the time, had no formal role in government. Which surely would have been a breach of the Official Secrets Act?
Either way, it's a police matter, right? |
Adam Wagner (who is pretty good on these things) suggested not illegal, probably against the guidelines at the time.
Rule/laws changed a lot and he knows his sh1t. | |
| |
| Today's twitter winner is... on 10:41 - Dec 21 with 973 views | Basuco |
Top right picture is James Slack, deputy editor of the scumpaper, with his dog Dilyn, I wonder why they didn't run with the story? |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
