| USA continuing to move backwards 21:11 - Jul 8 with 2738 views | ElderGrizzly |
The Jewish the target this time
|  | | |  |
| USA continuing to move backwards on 21:13 - Jul 8 with 2702 views | jeera |
"Chancery Court in Davidson County, Tennessee, has ruled that taxpayer funded establishments can place signs that say "No Jews Allowed" ... as long as there is at least one establishment where services for Jews are provided."
Please say this isn't real. |  |
| |
| USA continuing to move backwards on 21:21 - Jul 8 with 2657 views | Steve_M |
| USA continuing to move backwards on 21:13 - Jul 8 by jeera |
"Chancery Court in Davidson County, Tennessee, has ruled that taxpayer funded establishments can place signs that say "No Jews Allowed" ... as long as there is at least one establishment where services for Jews are provided."
Please say this isn't real. |
Separate, but equal seems to be the phrase here. |  |
| |
| USA continuing to move backwards on 21:35 - Jul 8 with 2590 views | ElderGrizzly |
| USA continuing to move backwards on 21:13 - Jul 8 by jeera |
"Chancery Court in Davidson County, Tennessee, has ruled that taxpayer funded establishments can place signs that say "No Jews Allowed" ... as long as there is at least one establishment where services for Jews are provided."
Please say this isn't real. |
Sadly it is.
I assume race will be next in some southern states | | | |
| USA continuing to move backwards on 21:41 - Jul 8 with 2579 views | Illinoisblue |
The headline in the Tennessee story is misleading |  |
| |
| USA continuing to move backwards on 21:52 - Jul 8 with 2542 views | Swansea_Blue |
| USA continuing to move backwards on 21:41 - Jul 8 by Illinoisblue |
The headline in the Tennessee story is misleading |
Completely misleading. I’ve just read the article and while I’ve no truck with religious segregation and fanaticism, that couple’s claim seemed tenuous at best. Not least because they were looking to adopt out of state from an organisation that only dealt in state.
Unless I’m missing something, the article’s got no link or relevance to the tweets. |  |
| |
| USA continuing to move backwards on 21:54 - Jul 8 with 2529 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
| USA continuing to move backwards on 21:41 - Jul 8 by Illinoisblue |
The headline in the Tennessee story is misleading |
That doesn’t sound like something the OP would post |  |
| |
| USA continuing to move backwards on 22:03 - Jul 8 with 2482 views | ElderGrizzly |
| USA continuing to move backwards on 21:54 - Jul 8 by C_HealyIsAPleasure |
That doesn’t sound like something the OP would post |
Well aren’t you lovely :)
The story hints at a deeper problem forming and one that appears to be growing in a number of states where religion is given as reasonable cause to discriminate while hiding behind another excuse | | | |
| USA continuing to move backwards on 22:03 - Jul 8 with 2479 views | ElderGrizzly |
| USA continuing to move backwards on 21:52 - Jul 8 by Swansea_Blue |
Completely misleading. I’ve just read the article and while I’ve no truck with religious segregation and fanaticism, that couple’s claim seemed tenuous at best. Not least because they were looking to adopt out of state from an organisation that only dealt in state.
Unless I’m missing something, the article’s got no link or relevance to the tweets. |
The two stories are different.
The first is more troubling than the second. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| USA continuing to move backwards on 22:56 - Jul 8 with 2332 views | Swansea_Blue |
| USA continuing to move backwards on 22:03 - Jul 8 by ElderGrizzly |
The two stories are different.
The first is more troubling than the second. |
Yeah, sure. The tweet for the second story is still wildly misleading though. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
