| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us 15:32 - Oct 8 with 1109 views | Illinoisblue |
But here we are |  |
| |  |
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 15:35 - Oct 8 with 1069 views | Bobsthename |
Different styles of play but there you go. |  | | |
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 15:35 - Oct 8 with 1048 views | gainsboroughblue |
Or to go one up. |  |
| |
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 15:36 - Oct 8 with 1018 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 15:35 - Oct 8 by gainsboroughblue |
Or to go one up. |
A long way to go. Need to get our game going and turn it around. |  |
| |
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 15:36 - Oct 8 with 1016 views | Illinoisblue |
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 15:35 - Oct 8 by gainsboroughblue |
Or to go one up. |
We’ve been sheeite. Getting what we deserve | |
| |
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 15:37 - Oct 8 with 963 views | FrimleyBlue |
Not been great and you just saw that goal coming. It'll be harder now as they sit deeper. Making Jackson innefctive imo. |  |
| |
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 15:38 - Oct 8 with 931 views | DJR |
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 15:36 - Oct 8 by Illinoisblue |
We’ve been sheeite. Getting what we deserve |
It's early days but Keogh doesn't fill me with confidence, and is not as good on the ball as Woolfy, which means we are not building from the back as we normally do. [Post edited 8 Oct 2022 15:38]
|  | | |
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 15:41 - Oct 8 with 810 views | Radlett_blue |
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 15:36 - Oct 8 by Illinoisblue |
We’ve been sheeite. Getting what we deserve |
70% Town possession, but no shots at all (!) versus Morecambe's 4. |  |
| |
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 15:52 - Oct 8 with 698 views | cressi |
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 15:37 - Oct 8 by FrimleyBlue |
Not been great and you just saw that goal coming. It'll be harder now as they sit deeper. Making Jackson innefctive imo. |
Jackson ineffective really | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 15:54 - Oct 8 with 659 views | Swansea_Blue |
It’s games like this we miss a genuine striker who can make something happen from nothing. Any Marcus Stewarts knocking around in the back of the cupboard? |  |
| |
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 15:56 - Oct 8 with 640 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 15:41 - Oct 8 by Radlett_blue |
70% Town possession, but no shots at all (!) versus Morecambe's 4. |
How did we hit the woodwork without a shot? Didn't Jackson shoot (well off target) from the rebound too? That stat looks wrong. | |
| |
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 16:04 - Oct 8 with 523 views | Bobsthename |
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 15:41 - Oct 8 by Radlett_blue |
70% Town possession, but no shots at all (!) versus Morecambe's 4. |
I said it earlier different tactics theirs at the moment looks more affective than ours and it shows can we change? i’m not sure. | | | |
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 16:04 - Oct 8 with 524 views | DJR |
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 15:52 - Oct 8 by cressi |
Jackson ineffective really |
OK, he missed a half chance but otherwise he's had to go wide to get the ball (and held it up fairly well). Unfortunately, he hasn't received any service in the box which is generally the case whoever we play in the No.9 position. | | | |
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 16:08 - Oct 8 with 488 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 16:04 - Oct 8 by Bobsthename |
I said it earlier different tactics theirs at the moment looks more affective than ours and it shows can we change? i’m not sure. |
Hitting the woodwork 3 times suggests we can break them down.
Need to put it in the net a few times now. | |
| |
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 16:08 - Oct 8 with 487 views | Radlett_blue |
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 15:56 - Oct 8 by Nthsuffolkblue |
How did we hit the woodwork without a shot? Didn't Jackson shoot (well off target) from the rebound too? That stat looks wrong. |
That was the stat when Morecambe scored. | |
| |
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 16:11 - Oct 8 with 455 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Was not expecting Morecambe to look more threatening than us on 16:08 - Oct 8 by Radlett_blue |
That was the stat when Morecambe scored. |
But not when you posted it. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
