| TJJ 15:27 - Nov 25 with 1447 views | wrightsrightglove |
McKenna seemed to suggest that TJJ is back at arsenal for a few weeks and then he’d be back with us, but that the injury is typically 3-4 months. Does this suggest that we’re lining up a permanent move for him in January? I would think if he’s out for 3-4 months we’d be ending the loan, returning him to arsenal permanently and finding someone else? |  | | |  |
| TJJ on 15:39 - Nov 25 with 1386 views | Illinoisblue |
Makes you wonder. Hamstring surgery doesn’t sound like a quick injury to come back from. Big window coming up for us. Huge. |  |
| |
| TJJ on 15:46 - Nov 25 with 1360 views | jayessess |
Might mean the time frame is a little shorter? He'll by approaching nearly 3 months post-surgery at the end of the window. |  |
| |
| TJJ on 15:49 - Nov 25 with 1344 views | abracaDOBRA_ |
Dont think its 3-4 months, sure i saw 2 months when first reported. I remember thinking he'd be back by Feb |  | | |
| TJJ on 15:52 - Nov 25 with 1332 views | PhilTWTD |
| TJJ on 15:49 - Nov 25 by abracaDOBRA_ |
Dont think its 3-4 months, sure i saw 2 months when first reported. I remember thinking he'd be back by Feb |
I asked KMc today and he said three to four months. He wasn't sure when asked previously, said it wouldn't be clear until he'd had the surgery. |  | | |
| TJJ on 16:01 - Nov 25 with 1295 views | hype313 |
| TJJ on 15:52 - Nov 25 by PhilTWTD |
I asked KMc today and he said three to four months. He wasn't sure when asked previously, said it wouldn't be clear until he'd had the surgery. |
On that basis, do you think we would send him back and de-register him then Phil, if it's 4 months? |  |
| |
| TJJ on 16:24 - Nov 25 with 1228 views | PhilTWTD |
| TJJ on 16:01 - Nov 25 by hype313 |
On that basis, do you think we would send him back and de-register him then Phil, if it's 4 months? |
Kieran didn't suggest that that might be the case. Might not be possible under the terms of the deal with Arsenal, often if a player gets injured with you you're stuck with him and his wages. Doesn't make any difference 22-man squad-wise, of course. | | | |
| TJJ on 17:18 - Nov 25 with 1146 views | hype313 |
| TJJ on 16:24 - Nov 25 by PhilTWTD |
Kieran didn't suggest that that might be the case. Might not be possible under the terms of the deal with Arsenal, often if a player gets injured with you you're stuck with him and his wages. Doesn't make any difference 22-man squad-wise, of course. |
Cheers. Yep completely forgot he's not classed in the 22, still, not ideal paying someone who won't play for a significant period of thier loan. | |
| |
| TJJ on 17:37 - Nov 25 with 1119 views | jayessess |
| TJJ on 17:18 - Nov 25 by hype313 |
Cheers. Yep completely forgot he's not classed in the 22, still, not ideal paying someone who won't play for a significant period of thier loan. |
Not ideal, but would put us in a good position to sign him permanently in the Summer if he got going again. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| TJJ on 18:10 - Nov 25 with 1083 views | LegendofthePhoenix |
| TJJ on 17:37 - Nov 25 by jayessess |
Not ideal, but would put us in a good position to sign him permanently in the Summer if he got going again. |
He won't be on high wages, and we won't be paying all of them anyway - its as much in Arsenal's interests as our that he gets proper game time. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
