| Chelsea sponsorship saga 10:30 - Jul 10 with 2016 views | GeoffSentence |
Anyone seen anything about this?
Chelsea don't have a shirt sponsor at the moment. Their contract with Three expired so they have been trying to get a new shirt sponsor.
They originally had a deal lined up with Paramount+ but according to The Metro that was blocked by the Premier League for fear of upsetting Sky.
Subsequently they were going to go with a gambling firm, which as we know would have been fine and dandy with the Premier League, but their supporter's trust objected to it.
Consequently their search for a sponsor has thus far been fruitless.
But I am flabberghasted that the Premier League should block Paramount+, a relatively harmless streaming and production company, whilst waving betting companies through without objection given the harm that betting can cause.
World gorn mad. |  |
| |  |
| Chelsea sponsorship saga on 10:33 - Jul 10 with 1957 views | WeWereZombies |
Interesting...and good on their Supporters Trust for making a decent objection and having the clout to make it count. |  |
| |
| Chelsea sponsorship saga on 10:53 - Jul 10 with 1866 views | BlueBadger |
| Chelsea sponsorship saga on 10:33 - Jul 10 by WeWereZombies |
Interesting...and good on their Supporters Trust for making a decent objection and having the clout to make it count. |
Fair play here, this is a rare example of Chelsea fans being vaguely decent. |  |
| |
| Chelsea sponsorship saga on 12:15 - Jul 10 with 1672 views | Illinoisblue |
And their new kit is not on sale until August 16th. All those billions and they’re a clown show of a club. |  |
| |
| Chelsea sponsorship saga on 12:21 - Jul 10 with 1650 views | Zx1988 |
Let's not forget that that's the same 'Three' who terminated their sponsorship agreement with Chelsea upon Russia's invasion of Ukraine but, conveniently enough, remained plastered over their shirts because apparently Chelsea couldn't afford to procure a new batch of unsponsored shirts. |  |
| |
| Chelsea sponsorship saga on 13:06 - Jul 10 with 1519 views | JackNorthStand |
This is based on no fact, just a general observation.
Would shirt sponsorship be that important to Chelsea? Forest went last season without a sponsor as they were not being offered what they valued their shirt sponsorship to be, so I am thinking this wouldn’t harm chelsea too much? Especially with them having less exposure this season, no Europe etc so presumably their shirt sponsorship would bring in a lot less money than usual? | | | |
| Chelsea sponsorship saga on 15:33 - Jul 10 with 1253 views | GeoffSentence |
| Chelsea sponsorship saga on 13:06 - Jul 10 by JackNorthStand |
This is based on no fact, just a general observation.
Would shirt sponsorship be that important to Chelsea? Forest went last season without a sponsor as they were not being offered what they valued their shirt sponsorship to be, so I am thinking this wouldn’t harm chelsea too much? Especially with them having less exposure this season, no Europe etc so presumably their shirt sponsorship would bring in a lot less money than usual? |
The previous deal with Three was worth £40M a year. Pretty substantial and a big loss to any team. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
you’d have thought the PL would’ve known that. 